Graeme M. Clark

855 total citations
11 papers, 683 citations indexed

About

Graeme M. Clark is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Signal Processing. According to data from OpenAlex, Graeme M. Clark has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 683 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Sensory Systems and 3 papers in Signal Processing. Recurrent topics in Graeme M. Clark's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (10 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (3 papers). Graeme M. Clark is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (10 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (3 papers). Graeme M. Clark collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United States. Graeme M. Clark's co-authors include Robert K. Shepherd, Jin Xu, Rodney E. Millard, S Staller, Margaret W. Skinner, Lesley A. Whitford, David Shipp, Antonio G. Paolini, Richard C. Dowell and Ashley M. Brown and has published in prestigious journals such as Hearing Research, Ear and Hearing and Brain Research Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Graeme M. Clark

11 papers receiving 650 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Graeme M. Clark Australia 10 577 319 171 160 153 11 683
I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer Austria 14 674 1.2× 289 0.9× 163 1.0× 152 0.9× 109 0.7× 35 824
R. C. Black Australia 14 630 1.1× 403 1.3× 108 0.6× 85 0.5× 205 1.3× 21 783
Y. C. Tong Australia 12 414 0.7× 226 0.7× 71 0.4× 220 1.4× 59 0.4× 35 624
Steven R. Otto United States 17 854 1.5× 636 2.0× 187 1.1× 120 0.8× 132 0.9× 31 1.1k
Chris van den Honert United States 14 1.1k 2.0× 852 2.7× 276 1.6× 198 1.2× 203 1.3× 18 1.2k
Olivier Macherey United Kingdom 20 1.0k 1.8× 641 2.0× 325 1.9× 313 2.0× 120 0.8× 38 1.1k
Robert D. Wolford United States 11 1.1k 1.9× 577 1.8× 417 2.4× 466 2.9× 114 0.7× 14 1.3k
Kerrie Plant Australia 17 930 1.6× 501 1.6× 398 2.3× 378 2.4× 57 0.4× 30 1000
Peter Seligman Australia 21 1.0k 1.8× 422 1.3× 256 1.5× 407 2.5× 216 1.4× 53 1.2k
Johan J. Hanekom South Africa 13 418 0.7× 205 0.6× 151 0.9× 162 1.0× 39 0.3× 41 520

Countries citing papers authored by Graeme M. Clark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme M. Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme M. Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme M. Clark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graeme M. Clark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme M. Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme M. Clark. The network helps show where Graeme M. Clark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graeme M. Clark

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graeme M. Clark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graeme M. Clark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graeme M. Clark. Graeme M. Clark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Galvin, Karyn L., et al.. (1999). A Comparison of Tactaid II and Tactaid 7 Use by Adults with a Profound Hearing Impairment. Ear and Hearing. 20(6). 471–482. 19 indexed citations
2.
Richardson, Louise M., Peter A. Busby, Peter J. Blarney, & Graeme M. Clark. (1998). Studies of Prosody Perception by Cochlear Implant Patients. International Journal of Audiology. 37(4). 231–245. 6 indexed citations
4.
Paolini, Antonio G. & Graeme M. Clark. (1998). Intracellular responses of the rat anteroventral cochlear nucleus to intracochlear electrical stimulation. Brain Research Bulletin. 46(4). 317–327. 18 indexed citations
5.
Liu, Xuguang, et al.. (1997). Histological and physiological effects of the central auditory prosthesis: surface versus penetrating electrodes. Hearing Research. 114(1-2). 264–274. 17 indexed citations
6.
Xu, Jin, Robert K. Shepherd, Rodney E. Millard, & Graeme M. Clark. (1997). Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study. Hearing Research. 105(1-2). 1–29. 210 indexed citations
7.
Tykocinski, Michael, Robert K. Shepherd, & Graeme M. Clark. (1997). Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. II. Comparison of fixed amplitude with amplitude modulated stimuli. Hearing Research. 112(1-2). 147–157. 23 indexed citations
9.
McKay, Colette M., Hugh J. McDermott, & Graeme M. Clark. (1995). Loudness summation for two channels of stimulation in cochlear implants: effects of spatial and temporal separation.. PubMed. 166. 230–3. 15 indexed citations
10.
Skinner, Margaret W., et al.. (1994). Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.. PubMed. 15 Suppl 2. 15–27. 227 indexed citations
11.
Clark, Graeme M., et al.. (1987). The University of Melbourne--nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant.. PubMed. 38. V–IX, 1. 90 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026