Gordon B. New
- Topics
- Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (1 paper)Head and Neck Anomalies (1 paper)Head and Neck Cancer Studies (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Gordon B. New
1 paper receiving 1 citation
Peers
Comparison fields: 4 of 4
- Surgery 1
- Otorhinolaryngology 1
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1
- Oncology 1
Countries citing papers authored by Gordon B. New
This map shows the geographic impact of Gordon B. New's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gordon B. New with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gordon B. New more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gordon B. New
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gordon B. New. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gordon B. New. The network helps show where Gordon B. New may publish in the future.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 |
About Gordon B. New
Gordon B. New is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Surgery and Infectious Diseases, having authored 2 papers that have together received 2 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (1 paper), Head and Neck Anomalies (1 paper) and Head and Neck Cancer Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (1 citation), Oncology (1 citation) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1 citation). Their work appears in journals such as The Laryngoscope and Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.