Godfrey C. Burns
About
In The Last Decade
Godfrey C. Burns
6 papers receiving 472 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Infectious Diseases 305
- Nephrology 222
- Emergency Medicine 201
- Virology 154
- Molecular Biology 77
Countries citing papers authored by Godfrey C. Burns
This map shows the geographic impact of Godfrey C. Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Godfrey C. Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Godfrey C. Burns more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Godfrey C. Burns
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Godfrey C. Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Godfrey C. Burns. The network helps show where Godfrey C. Burns may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Godfrey C. Burns
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Godfrey C. Burns. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Godfrey C. Burns based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Godfrey C. Burns. Godfrey C. Burns is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 78 | |
| 3 | 257 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 101 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | Staphylococcal infection in Christ-church in 1958. | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.