Glenys Parry
About
In The Last Decade
Glenys Parry
5 papers receiving 277 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- General Health Professions 200
- Sociology and Political Science 116
- Social Psychology 62
- Clinical Psychology 57
- Health 51
Countries citing papers authored by Glenys Parry
This map shows the geographic impact of Glenys Parry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glenys Parry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glenys Parry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Glenys Parry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glenys Parry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glenys Parry. The network helps show where Glenys Parry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Glenys Parry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Glenys Parry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Glenys Parry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Glenys Parry. Glenys Parry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53 | |
| 2 | The Health Status of Gypsies & Travellers in England | 20 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Coping with crises | 42 |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 192 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.