Glenn Wells

18 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers

Glenn Wells
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Applied Psychology 14
  • Computer Science Applications 16
  • Health Information Management 12
  • General Health Professions 61
Replace Dehua Hu with:
Dehua Hu China
M. Sriram Iyengar United States
Lucy Hederman Ireland
Abrar Alturkistani United Kingdom
Sven Meister Germany
Bill Fitzgerald
Henna Kim United States
Sarah Chaytor United Kingdom
Lena Griebel Germany
Vinícius Lima Brazil
Glenn Wells relative to Dehua Hu China Dehua Hu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Dehua Hu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Glenn Wells

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Glenn Wells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glenn Wells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glenn Wells more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Glenn Wells

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glenn Wells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glenn Wells. The network helps show where Glenn Wells may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Glenn Wells, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Glenn Wells Line = papers co-authored together Glenn Wells links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200457
2 201833
3 201831
4 201827
5 201827
6 201426
7 201818
8 201817
9 201814
10 201813
11 20179
12 20198
13 20197
14 20113
15 20182
16 20181
17
Determining the Effectiveness of a Massive Open Online Course in Data Science for Health.
20181
18 20201

About Glenn Wells

Glenn Wells is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Epidemiology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper), Educational Leadership and Innovation (1 paper), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (1 paper), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (1 paper), Healthcare Quality and Management (1 paper) and Climate Change and Health Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (8 citations), Applied Psychology (14 citations), Computer Science Applications (16 citations), Health Information Management (12 citations) and General Health Professions (61 citations). Glenn Wells has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David Brindley, Edward Meinert, Abrar Alturkistani, Michelle Helena van Velthoven, Josip Car, Ad Spanos, Marco Geymonat, Steven G. Sedgwick, Stephen J. Smerdon and Azeem Majeed. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, JMIR Medical Education, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact