Glenn Parsons

652 total citations
22 papers, 328 citations indexed

About

Glenn Parsons is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Glenn Parsons has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 328 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Glenn Parsons's work include Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (10 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (7 papers) and Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (4 papers). Glenn Parsons is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (10 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (7 papers) and Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (4 papers). Glenn Parsons collaborates with scholars based in Canada. Glenn Parsons's co-authors include Charlotte A. Spencer, Allen Carlson, Judy Jones, Xin Zhang, James Robert Brown and Daniel P. Toews and has published in prestigious journals such as Molecular and Cellular Biology, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology and Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.

In The Last Decade

Glenn Parsons

19 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Glenn Parsons
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Molecular Biology 97
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 77
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 69
  • Social Psychology 55
  • Sociology and Political Science 36
Replace Timo Maran with:
Timo Maran Estonia
Brent Elliott United Kingdom
Morten Tønnessen Norway
Philip J. Pauly United States
Eytan Avital Israel
Michael Marder Spain
Linda Van Speybroeck Belgium
Trevor Pearce United States
Ned Hettinger United States
Matthew J. Barker Canada
Timo Maran Estonia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Glenn Parsons
Glenn Parsons · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Glenn Parsons
Glenn Parsons · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Glenn Parsons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Glenn Parsons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glenn Parsons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glenn Parsons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Glenn Parsons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glenn Parsons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glenn Parsons. The network helps show where Glenn Parsons may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Glenn Parsons

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Glenn Parsons. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Glenn Parsons based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Glenn Parsons. Glenn Parsons is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 5
2
Appreciating Nature and Art: Recent Western and Chinese Perspectives
1
3 5
4
The Philosophy of Design
14
5 3
6 9
7 4
8 1
9 62
10 17
11 12
12 12
13 1
14 3
15 16
16 7
17 30
18 1
19 100
20 5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026