Glenn Hitchman
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONENeuroImage
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Glenn Hitchman
34 papers receiving 566 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Cognitive Neuroscience 389
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 231
- Social Psychology 112
- Clinical Psychology 87
- Sociology and Political Science 56
Countries citing papers authored by Glenn Hitchman
This map shows the geographic impact of Glenn Hitchman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glenn Hitchman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glenn Hitchman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Glenn Hitchman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glenn Hitchman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glenn Hitchman. The network helps show where Glenn Hitchman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Glenn Hitchman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Glenn Hitchman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Glenn Hitchman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Glenn Hitchman. Glenn Hitchman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The effects of experimenter-participant interaction qualities in a goal-oriented nonintentional precognition task | 1 |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | A reexamination of nonintentional precognition with openness to experience, creativity, psi beliefs, and luck beliefs as predictors of success. | 5 |
About Glenn Hitchman
Glenn Hitchman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (389 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (231 citations) and General Decision Sciences (12 citations). Glenn Hitchman has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jiang Qiu, Dongtao Wei, Antao Chen, Wenfu Li, Qinglin Zhang, Yijun Liu, Lijun Wang, Zhencai Chen, Ting Wang and Yadan Li. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.