G.J. van Rooij
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 1%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Catalysis top 5%
- Co-authors
- M. C. M. van de SandenD C M van den BekeromW.A. BongersRon M. A. HeerenN.J. Lopes CardozoMarc C. DuursmaN. den HarderAlex van de Steeg
- Topics
- Magnetic confinement fusion research (53 papers)Fusion materials and technologies (45 papers)Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (43 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
G.J. van Rooij
114 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Materials Chemistry 1.6k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.0k
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 972
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 677
- Catalysis 382
Countries citing papers authored by G.J. van Rooij
This map shows the geographic impact of G.J. van Rooij's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.J. van Rooij with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.J. van Rooij more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G.J. van Rooij
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.J. van Rooij. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.J. van Rooij. The network helps show where G.J. van Rooij may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G.J. van Rooij
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G.J. van Rooij. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G.J. van Rooij based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G.J. van Rooij. G.J. van Rooij is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 39 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 70 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | Measurements of plasma diffusion coefficient in Pilot-PSI device using Katsumata probe | 1 |
| 17 | 40 | |
| 18 | 67 | |
| 19 | 52 | |
| 20 | 52 |
About G.J. van Rooij
G.J. van Rooij is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Catalysis and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 117 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (53 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (45 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (43 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (382 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (677 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.0k citations). G.J. van Rooij has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include M. C. M. van de Sanden, D C M van den Bekerom, W.A. Bongers, Ron M. A. Heeren, N.J. Lopes Cardozo, Marc C. Duursma, N. den Harder, Alex van de Steeg, F J J Peeters and R. Engeln. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.