Gina Caplen

731 total citations
20 papers, 549 citations indexed

About

Gina Caplen is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Gina Caplen has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 549 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 14 papers in Small Animals and 4 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Gina Caplen's work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (18 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (13 papers) and Livestock and Poultry Management (5 papers). Gina Caplen is often cited by papers focused on Animal Nutrition and Physiology (18 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (13 papers) and Livestock and Poultry Management (5 papers). Gina Caplen collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Egypt. Gina Caplen's co-authors include Christine J Nicol, William J. Browne, Joanne Edgar, Becky Hothersall, Joanna C. Murrell, Claire A Weeks, A. E. Waterman‐Pearson, GR Colborne, Randall M. Parker and Poppy Statham and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Dairy Science and Animal Behaviour.

In The Last Decade

Gina Caplen

20 papers receiving 532 citations

Peers

Gina Caplen
Christina Rufener Switzerland
T. C. Danbury United Kingdom
Becky Hothersall United Kingdom
Leonie Jacobs United States
L. Μ. McLeay New Zealand
Ariane Stratmann Switzerland
B.H. Misson United States
Christina Rufener Switzerland
Gina Caplen
Citations per year, relative to Gina Caplen Gina Caplen (= 1×) peers Christina Rufener

Countries citing papers authored by Gina Caplen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gina Caplen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gina Caplen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gina Caplen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gina Caplen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gina Caplen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gina Caplen. The network helps show where Gina Caplen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gina Caplen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gina Caplen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gina Caplen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gina Caplen. Gina Caplen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Paul, Elizabeth S., William J. Browne, Michael Mendl, et al.. (2023). Affective trajectories: Are hens influenced by positive and negative changes in their living conditions?. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 261. 105883–105883. 5 indexed citations
2.
Paul, Elizabeth S., William J. Browne, Michael Mendl, et al.. (2022). Assessing animal welfare: a triangulation of preference, judgement bias and other candidate welfare indicators. Animal Behaviour. 186. 151–177. 18 indexed citations
3.
Caplen, Gina & Suzanne Held. (2021). Changes in social and feeding behaviors, activity, and salivary serum amyloid A in cows with subclinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science. 104(10). 10991–11008. 7 indexed citations
4.
Paul, Elizabeth S., Joanne Edgar, Gina Caplen, & Christine J Nicol. (2018). Examining affective structure in chickens: valence, intensity, persistence and generalization measured using a Conditioned Place Preference Test. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 207. 39–48. 11 indexed citations
5.
Nicol, Christine J, Gina Caplen, Jo Hockenhull, et al.. (2017). Farmed Bird |Welfare Science Review. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 10 indexed citations
6.
Hothersall, Becky, et al.. (2016). Effects of carprofen, meloxicam and butorphanol on broiler chickens’ performance in mobility tests. Animal Welfare. 25(1). 55–67. 22 indexed citations
7.
Hothersall, Becky, Gina Caplen, Randall M. Parker, et al.. (2014). Thermal Nociceptive Threshold Testing Detects Altered Sensory Processing in Broiler Chickens with Spontaneous Lameness. PLoS ONE. 9(5). e97883–e97883. 14 indexed citations
8.
Caplen, Gina, Becky Hothersall, Christine J Nicol, et al.. (2014). Lameness is consistently better at predicting broiler chicken performance in mobility tests than other broiler characteristics. Animal Welfare. 23(2). 179–187. 28 indexed citations
9.
Caplen, Gina, Laurence C. Baker, Becky Hothersall, et al.. (2013). Thermal nociception as a measure of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug effectiveness in broiler chickens with articular pain. The Veterinary Journal. 198(3). 616–619. 21 indexed citations
10.
Caplen, Gina, GR Colborne, Becky Hothersall, et al.. (2013). Lame broiler chickens respond to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with objective changes in gait function: A controlled clinical trial. The Veterinary Journal. 196(3). 477–482. 54 indexed citations
11.
Browne, William J., et al.. (2013). Positive affective state induced by opioid analgesia in laying hens with bone fractures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 147(1-2). 127–131. 47 indexed citations
12.
Caplen, Gina, Becky Hothersall, Joanna C. Murrell, et al.. (2012). Kinematic Analysis Quantifies Gait Abnormalities Associated with Lameness in Broiler Chickens and Identifies Evolutionary Gait Differences. PLoS ONE. 7(7). e40800–e40800. 62 indexed citations
13.
Nicol, Christine J, et al.. (2011). Relationships between multiple welfare indicators measured in individual chickens across different time periods and environments. Animal Welfare. 20(2). 133–143. 28 indexed citations
14.
Hothersall, Becky, Gina Caplen, Christine J Nicol, et al.. (2011). Development of mechanical and thermal nociceptive threshold testing devices in unrestrained birds (broiler chickens). Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 201(1). 220–227. 23 indexed citations
15.
Nicol, Christine J, Gina Caplen, Poppy Statham, & William J. Browne. (2011). Decisions about foraging and risk trade-offs in chickens are associated with individual somatic response profiles. Animal Behaviour. 82(2). 255–262. 27 indexed citations
16.
Browne, William J., Gina Caplen, Poppy Statham, & Christine J Nicol. (2011). Mild environmental aversion is detected by a discrete-choice preference testing method but not by a free-access method. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 134(3-4). 152–163. 10 indexed citations
17.
Caplen, Gina, Becky Hothersall, Dorothy McKeegan, et al.. (2011). Thermal nociception as a tool to investigate NSAID analgesia in a model of inflammatory pain in broilers. 1 indexed citations
18.
Hothersall, Becky, Gina Caplen, Jo Murrell, et al.. (2010). DEVELOPMENT OF NEW TECHNIQUES TO ASSESS PAIN IN DOMESTIC CHICKENS. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 1 indexed citations
19.
Browne, William J., et al.. (2009). Consistency, transitivity and inter-relationships between measures of choice in environmental preference tests with chickens. Behavioural Processes. 83(1). 72–78. 21 indexed citations
20.
Nicol, Christine J, Gina Caplen, Joanne Edgar, & William J. Browne. (2009). Associations between welfare indicators and environmental choice in laying hens. Animal Behaviour. 78(2). 413–424. 139 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026