Gilles Charvin
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- David BensimonVincent CroquetteEric D. SiggiaFrederick R. CrossTerence R. StrickJean‐François AllemandJulien VermotFrancesco Boselli
- Topics
- Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (12 papers)Fungal and yeast genetics research (11 papers)Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (9 papers)
- Cited by
- AgingBiophysicsMolecular Biology
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Gilles Charvin
45 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
- Biomedical Engineering 330
- Cell Biology 312
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 218
- Genetics 168
Countries citing papers authored by Gilles Charvin
This map shows the geographic impact of Gilles Charvin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilles Charvin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilles Charvin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gilles Charvin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilles Charvin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilles Charvin. The network helps show where Gilles Charvin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gilles Charvin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gilles Charvin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gilles Charvin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gilles Charvin. Gilles Charvin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 46 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 140 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 164 | |
| 15 | 84 | |
| 16 | 79 | |
| 17 | 83 | |
| 18 | 109 | |
| 19 | 63 | |
| 20 | Observation des cycles enzymatiques des ADN topoisomérases par micromanipulation de molécules individuelles | 11 |
About Gilles Charvin
Gilles Charvin is a scholar working on Aging, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (12 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (11 papers) and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (167 citations), Biophysics (148 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.6k citations). Gilles Charvin has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include David Bensimon, Vincent Croquette, Eric D. Siggia, Frederick R. Cross, Terence R. Strick, Jean‐François Allemand, Julien Vermot, Francesco Boselli, Stéphane Roth and Nynke H. Dekker. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nucleic Acids Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.