Giles E. Dawson

461 total citations
13 papers, 77 citations indexed

About

Giles E. Dawson is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology and History. According to data from OpenAlex, Giles E. Dawson has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 77 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 3 papers in Anthropology and 2 papers in History. Recurrent topics in Giles E. Dawson's work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (2 papers) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers). Giles E. Dawson is often cited by papers focused on Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (2 papers) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers). Giles E. Dawson collaborates with scholars based in . Giles E. Dawson's co-authors include Donald W. Foster, W. W. Greg and A. C. F. Beales and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Educational Studies, The Modern Language Review and Shakespeare Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Giles E. Dawson

10 papers receiving 48 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Giles E. Dawson	5	34	20	9	9	8	13	77
Eugene M. Waith Australia	5	40 1.2×	16 0.8×	8 0.9×	5 0.6×	15 1.9×	24	76
Roger Lonsdale United Kingdom	5	35 1.0×	19 0.9×	7 0.8×	2 0.2×	9 1.1×	13	81
T. H. Howard-Hill United States	6	43 1.3×	21 1.1×	16 1.8×	10 1.1×	8 1.0×	25	83
Arthur Terry United Kingdom	5	51 1.5×	15 0.8×	9 1.0×	3 0.3×	11 1.4×	44	82
Peter Ure United Kingdom	5	26 0.8×	16 0.8×	8 0.9×	2 0.2×	15 1.9×	33	72
W. W. Greg	6	67 2.0×	33 1.6×	36 4.0×	8 0.9×	15 1.9×	22	113
Nicolas Barker France	5	14 0.4×	21 1.1×	11 1.2×	3 0.3×	9 1.1×	21	63
Charlton Hinman United States	4	64 1.9×	20 1.0×	25 2.8×	13 1.4×	12 1.5×	9	101
Anne Barton United Kingdom	5	42 1.2×	21 1.1×	10 1.1×	3 0.3×	13 1.6×	15	92
C. J. Sisson	4	34 1.0×	9 0.5×	5 0.6×	6 0.7×	6 0.8×	7	77

Countries citing papers authored by Giles E. Dawson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giles E. Dawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giles E. Dawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giles E. Dawson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giles E. Dawson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giles E. Dawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giles E. Dawson. The network helps show where Giles E. Dawson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Giles E. Dawson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Giles E. Dawson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Giles E. Dawson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Giles E. Dawson. Giles E. Dawson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Dawson, Giles E.. (1992). A Seventh Signature for Shakespeare. Shakespeare Quarterly. 43(1). 72–72. 1 indexed citations

2.

Dawson, Giles E. & Donald W. Foster. (1990). Elegy by W. S.: A Study in Attribution.. Shakespeare Quarterly. 41(1). 128–128. 19 indexed citations

3.

Beales, A. C. F., et al.. (1969). Elizabethan Handwriting, 1500-1650. British Journal of Educational Studies. 17(1). 105–105. 2 indexed citations

4.

Dawson, Giles E., et al.. (1968). Elizabethan handwriting, 1500-1650 : a guide to the reading of documents and manuscripts. Faber and Faber eBooks. 6 indexed citations

5.

Dawson, Giles E., et al.. (1968). Elizabethan Handwriting, 1500-1650. A Manual. The Modern Language Review. 63(1). 169–169. 4 indexed citations

6.

Dawson, Giles E., et al.. (1968). Collections Volume VII: Records of Plays and Players in Kent, 1450-1642. The Modern Language Review. 63(1). 173–173.

7.

Dawson, Giles E., et al.. (1965). Four Centuries of Shakespeare Publication.. Shakespeare Quarterly. 16(4). 360–360. 2 indexed citations

8.

Dawson, Giles E.. (1964). London's Bull-Baiting and Bear-Baiting Arena in 1562. Shakespeare Quarterly. 15(1). 97–97. 3 indexed citations

9.

Dawson, Giles E., et al.. (1962). The Organization and Personnel of the Shakespearean Company.. Shakespeare Quarterly. 13(4). 584–584. 19 indexed citations

10.

Dawson, Giles E. & W. W. Greg. (1958). Some Aspects and Problems of London Publishing between 1550 and 1650.. Shakespeare Quarterly. 9(4). 563–563. 15 indexed citations

11.

Dawson, Giles E., et al.. (1958). A History of Hamlet Criticism, 1601-1821.. Shakespeare Quarterly. 9(3). 418–418. 2 indexed citations

12.

Dawson, Giles E., et al.. (1957). New Readings in Shakespeare. The Modern Language Review. 52(1). 97–97. 1 indexed citations

13.

Dawson, Giles E., et al.. (1956). The Age of Shakespeare.. Shakespeare Quarterly. 7(4). 431–431. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact