Gilbert Highet

1.6k citations
27 papers · 174 indexed · h-index 5

Impact in

  • Anthropology top 10%
    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Classics top 10%
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

Gilbert Highet

20 papers receiving 100 citations

Peers

Gilbert Highet
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Anthropology 61
  • Classics 21
  • Literature and Literary Theory 50
  • Philosophy 29
  • General Arts and Humanities 2
Replace W. B. Stanford with:
W. B. Stanford Ireland
Floyd L. Moreland
Wesley Trimpi United States
George E. Duckworth
Hugh Shields Ireland
Aeschylus
Seth L. Schein United States
Marsh McCall
D. J. Conacher
C. A. Patrides United States
Gilbert Highet relative to W. B. Stanford Ireland W. B. Stanford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
W. B. Stanford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gilbert Highet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gilbert Highet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilbert Highet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilbert Highet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gilbert Highet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilbert Highet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilbert Highet. The network helps show where Gilbert Highet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Gilbert Highet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gilbert Highet Line = papers co-authored together Gilbert Highet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The anatomy of satire
196261
2 195535
3 197328
4 19735
5 19515
6
Ovid's Metamorphoses in fifteen books
19614
7
Poets in a Landscape
19574
8 19754
9 19514
10
Anatomy of Satire
19624
11 19743
12
The Huntsman and the Castaway
19732
13 19512
14 19562
15 19642
16 19742
17
The immortal profession : the joys of teaching and learning
19761
18 20151
19 19521
20 20151

About Gilbert Highet

Gilbert Highet is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Classics, Language and Linguistics and Linguistics and Language, having authored 27 papers that have together received 174 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (5 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers), Religious, Philosophical, and Educational Studies (1 paper), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper), Historical and Linguistic Studies (1 paper), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (1 paper) and Turkish Literature and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (61 citations), Classics (21 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (50 citations), Philosophy (29 citations) and General Arts and Humanities (2 citations). Frequent co-authors include Arthur Stanley Pease, Niall Rudd, James Hutton, B.C. or A.D. Ovid, John Dryden, Joseph Addison, Alexander Pope and Felix M. Wassermann. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Philology, The Classical World, Phoenix, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology and Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact