Gilbert Ames Bliss
Impact in
-
- History and Theory of Mathematics
Papers in
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Gilbert Ames Bliss
2 papers receiving 3 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 9
- Theoretical Computer Science 2
- General Psychology 1
- History and Philosophy of Science 2
- Computer Science Applications 1
- Communication 1
Countries citing papers authored by Gilbert Ames Bliss
This map shows the geographic impact of Gilbert Ames Bliss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilbert Ames Bliss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilbert Ames Bliss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gilbert Ames Bliss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilbert Ames Bliss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilbert Ames Bliss. The network helps show where Gilbert Ames Bliss may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1952 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1952 | 2 |
About Gilbert Ames Bliss
Gilbert Ames Bliss is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry, Surgery, Communication and Small Animals, having authored 2 papers that have together received 4 indexed citations. The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations), General Psychology (1 citation), History and Philosophy of Science (2 citations), Computer Science Applications (1 citation) and Communication (1 citation). Gilbert Ames Bliss has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as American Mathematical Monthly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.