Gianluigi Conte

885 citations
14 papers · 589 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Gianluigi Conte

14 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers

Gianluigi Conte
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Biological Psychiatry 30
  • Clinical Psychology 216
  • Applied Psychology 43
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 119
  • Communication 40
Replace Federico Tonioni with:
Federico Tonioni Italy
Melissa Daniels United States
Florence J. Breslin United States
Tomohiro Shirasaka Japan
Pin‐Hsuan Lin Taiwan
Charlotte Haws United States
Min-Hyeon Park South Korea
Liana R.N. Schreiber United States
Nona N. Gamel United States
Su Mi Park South Korea
Gianluigi Conte relative to Federico Tonioni Italy Federico Tonioni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Federico Tonioni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gianluigi Conte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gianluigi Conte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gianluigi Conte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gianluigi Conte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gianluigi Conte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gianluigi Conte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gianluigi Conte. The network helps show where Gianluigi Conte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gianluigi Conte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gianluigi Conte Line = papers co-authored together Gianluigi Conte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2010195
2 2007101
3 201194
4 201335
5 201432
6 201431
7 201123
8 200019
9 201219
10 200318
11 20079
12 19966
13 19976
14 20161

About Gianluigi Conte

Gianluigi Conte is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 589 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Workaholism, burnout, and well-being (2 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (30 citations), Clinical Psychology (216 citations), Applied Psychology (43 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (119 citations) and Communication (40 citations). Gianluigi Conte has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Japan and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Giovanni Martinotti, Pietro Bria, Marco Di Nicola, Luigi Janiri, Maria Cassano, Filippo Petruccelli, Giuseppe La Torre, C. Villella, Valerio Ricci and Francesco Angelucci. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Metabolism, BioMed Research International, Journal of Gambling Studies and Journal of Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact