Ghulam Shabbir

70 papers receiving 665 citations

Peers

Ghulam Shabbir
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 589
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 575
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 83
  • Materials Chemistry 42
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 38
Replace Omer Farooq with:
Omer Farooq Poland
Jiang Long China
M. Žáček Czechia
Mario Galante Ireland
Khusniddin K. Olimov Uzbekistan
K. Inoue Japan
Kanti Jotania India
Luis Gonzalez‐Mestres France
P. Petreczky Germany
Su Yao China
Ghulam Shabbir relative to Omer Farooq Poland Omer Farooq's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Omer Farooq · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ghulam Shabbir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ghulam Shabbir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ghulam Shabbir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ghulam Shabbir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ghulam Shabbir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ghulam Shabbir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ghulam Shabbir. The network helps show where Ghulam Shabbir may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ghulam Shabbir

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ghulam Shabbir. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ghulam Shabbir based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ghulam Shabbir. Ghulam Shabbir is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 4
3 7
4 9
5 10
6 1
7 14
8 21
9 6
10 6
11 18
12 11
13 5
14
Self-Similar Solutions of Bianchi Type iii Space-Times Using Partial Differential Equations
2
15
A NOTE ON PROPER AFFINE VECTOR FIELDS IN NON-STATIC SPHERICALLY SYMMETRIC SPACE-TIMES
0
16
Classiflcation of cylindrically symmetric static space-times according to their proper homothetic vector flelds
4
17 6
18 2
19
Proper Curvature Collineations in Bianchi Type I Space-Times
4
20
Some Examples of Space-Time Curvature Collineations
3

About Ghulam Shabbir

Ghulam Shabbir is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 76 papers that have together received 678 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (62 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (57 papers) and Advanced Differential Geometry Research (55 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (575 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (589 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (83 citations). Ghulam Shabbir has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, South Africa and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Fiaz Hussain, Suhail Khan, Muhammad Ramzan, Sameerah Jamal, F. M. Mahomed, A. H. Qureshi, A. H. Kara, Muhammad Amer Qureshi, Muhammad Ramzan and Amjad Ali. Their work appears in journals such as Materials Letters, Classical and Quantum Gravity and The European Physical Journal Plus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026