Ghada Ismail

21 papers receiving 480 citations

Peers

Ghada Ismail
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 152
  • Molecular Medicine 159
  • Endocrinology 72
  • Clinical Biochemistry 79
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 54
Replace Anis Karuniawati with:
Anis Karuniawati Indonesia
R Valencia Spain
Surbhi Khurana India
Frank Tverdek United States
Jocelyn Qi-Min Teo Singapore
Jaye Weston United States
Çağrı Büke Türkiye
Haley J. Morrill United States
Michael P. Veve United States
A Malini India
Ghada Ismail relative to Anis Karuniawati Indonesia Anis Karuniawati's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Anis Karuniawati · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ghada Ismail

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ghada Ismail's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ghada Ismail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ghada Ismail more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ghada Ismail

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ghada Ismail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ghada Ismail. The network helps show where Ghada Ismail may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ghada Ismail, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ghada Ismail Line = papers co-authored together Ghada Ismail links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20233
4
Navigating and Reimagining Community Engagement amidst COVID-19
20222
5 20223
6 20220
7 20229
8 20210
9 202085
10 20200
11 20184
12 20184
13 201677
14 201641
15 20150
16 201548
17 201550
18 201334
19
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Larix decidua: An assessment of factors Influencing the efficiency of gus gene transfer
20042
20
Acute splenic sequestration crisis in children with sickle cell disease.
20018

About Ghada Ismail

Ghada Ismail is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Molecular Medicine, Clinical Biochemistry and Infectious Diseases, having authored 28 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Use and Resistance (6 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (4 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (3 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (2 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (2 papers) and Inflammation biomarkers and pathways (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (152 citations), Molecular Medicine (159 citations), Endocrinology (72 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (79 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (54 citations). Ghada Ismail has collaborated with scholars based in Egypt, United States and Yemen. Frequent co-authors include Soad Hafez, Maha Talaat, Amani El‐Kholy, Fernanda C. Lessa, Samia A. Girgis, Amr Kandeel, Martin H. Bluth, Maysaa El Sayed Zaki, Meghan Lyman and M. Abdallah. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, American Journal of Infection Control, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Infection and Drug Resistance and RSC Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026