Getzel M. Cohen
About
In The Last Decade
Getzel M. Cohen
8 papers receiving 92 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Archeology 104
- Anthropology 54
- Classics 31
- Religious studies 17
- Sociology and Political Science 16
Countries citing papers authored by Getzel M. Cohen
This map shows the geographic impact of Getzel M. Cohen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Getzel M. Cohen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Getzel M. Cohen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Getzel M. Cohen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Getzel M. Cohen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Getzel M. Cohen. The network helps show where Getzel M. Cohen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Getzel M. Cohen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Getzel M. Cohen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Getzel M. Cohen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Getzel M. Cohen. Getzel M. Cohen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 50 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.