Gerhard Buess
- Surgery top 5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Co-authors
- M. O. SchurrAndreas KirschniakW KunertHorst‐Dieter BeckerM StarlingerB. MentgesK. MannckeSebastian Schostek
- Topics
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (13 papers)Surgical Simulation and Training (10 papers)Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (8 papers)
- Cited by
- SurgeryOncologyGastroenterology
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Gerhard Buess
31 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Surgery 897
- Oncology 528
- Biomedical Engineering 300
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 221
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 97
Countries citing papers authored by Gerhard Buess
This map shows the geographic impact of Gerhard Buess's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerhard Buess with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerhard Buess more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gerhard Buess
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerhard Buess. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerhard Buess. The network helps show where Gerhard Buess may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gerhard Buess
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gerhard Buess. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gerhard Buess based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gerhard Buess. Gerhard Buess is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 182 | |
| 4 | 39 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | Transanal endoscopic microsurgery : principles and techniques | 5 |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): a new technique and development during a time period of 20 years. | 26 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 51 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 210 | |
| 20 | 129 |
About Gerhard Buess
Gerhard Buess is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (13 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (10 papers) and Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (897 citations), Oncology (528 citations) and Gastroenterology (73 citations). Gerhard Buess has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. O. Schurr, Andreas Kirschniak, W Kunert, Horst‐Dieter Becker, M Starlinger, B. Mentges, K. Manncke, Sebastian Schostek, Bruce A. Orkin and Theodore J. Saclarides. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, European Urology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.