Gerard E. Bruder

1.1k total citations
12 papers, 830 citations indexed

About

Gerard E. Bruder is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Gerard E. Bruder has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 830 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 2 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Gerard E. Bruder's work include Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (7 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers). Gerard E. Bruder is often cited by papers focused on Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (7 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers). Gerard E. Bruder collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Gerard E. Bruder's co-authors include Craig E. Tenke, Paul Leite, Regan Fong, F M Quitkin, James Towey, Patrick J. McGrath, Jonathan Stewart, Jonathan W. Stewart, Patrick J. McGrath and Frederic M. Quitkin and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Gerard E. Bruder

11 papers receiving 804 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gerard E. Bruder United States 10 632 266 176 109 88 12 830
J.-B. Pochon France 8 779 1.2× 307 1.2× 173 1.0× 81 0.7× 146 1.7× 8 1.1k
Maria M. Rive Netherlands 6 402 0.6× 249 0.9× 159 0.9× 86 0.8× 90 1.0× 7 602
James Towey United States 14 813 1.3× 329 1.2× 212 1.2× 60 0.6× 247 2.8× 16 1.0k
Paul Leite United States 17 967 1.5× 411 1.5× 224 1.3× 115 1.1× 252 2.9× 18 1.3k
Dirk Schwerthöffer Germany 10 949 1.5× 382 1.4× 233 1.3× 73 0.7× 99 1.1× 26 1.1k
Christina L. Fales United States 12 719 1.1× 440 1.7× 181 1.0× 133 1.2× 139 1.6× 16 1.1k
Yvonne Czechowska Canada 9 436 0.7× 147 0.6× 277 1.6× 60 0.6× 72 0.8× 9 700
Huixia Zhou China 12 500 0.8× 301 1.1× 178 1.0× 44 0.4× 119 1.4× 49 845
Jean‐Baptiste Pochon United States 9 385 0.6× 180 0.7× 89 0.5× 74 0.7× 58 0.7× 17 585
James P. O’Shea United States 8 396 0.6× 282 1.1× 133 0.8× 64 0.6× 123 1.4× 10 764

Countries citing papers authored by Gerard E. Bruder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gerard E. Bruder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerard E. Bruder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerard E. Bruder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gerard E. Bruder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerard E. Bruder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerard E. Bruder. The network helps show where Gerard E. Bruder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gerard E. Bruder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gerard E. Bruder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gerard E. Bruder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gerard E. Bruder. Gerard E. Bruder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
2.
Bruder, Gerard E.. (2003). Verbal memory in schizophrenia: additional evidence of subtypes having different cognitive deficits. Schizophrenia Research. 68(2-3). 137–147. 36 indexed citations
3.
Bruder, Gerard E., Jonathan W. Stewart, Craig E. Tenke, et al.. (2001). Electroencephalographic and perceptual asymmetry differences between responders and nonresponders to an SSRI antidepressant21Data from two treatment protocols were combined so as to yield sufficient samples of female and male fluoxetine responders and nonresponders. With the exception of the initial placebo period in one study, the treatment protocols were comparable in terms of both fluoxetine doses and the raters evaluating treatment response. Most importantly, the differences between fluoxetine responders and nonresponders reported for the total samples were also evident when only the data for the placebo-controlled protocol were analyzed; however, the larger total sample allowed us to also take patient gender into account.22The 18 healthy women were screened for psychopathology using a structured interview schedule and were excluded if they had a hearing loss, substance abuse, a history of head trauma, or other neurologic disorder. They did not differ significantly from the female patients in education (mean = 15.8, SD = 1.3) or handedness (LQ = 84.7, SD = 20.6), but they were somewhat younger than the female patients [mean age = 27.6, SD = 6.9;t(35) = 3.21,p = .001]. Age was not, however, related to perceptual asymmetry scores of either female patients (r = −.01, ns) or male patients (r = −.02, ns) on the fused words test. Nor was age significantly correlated with alpha asymmetry scores of female patients (r = −.09, ns) or male patients (r = .11, ns).. Biological Psychiatry. 49(5). 416–425. 153 indexed citations
4.
Friedman, Michelle, Gerard E. Bruder, Paul G. Nestor, et al.. (2001). Perceptual Asymmetries in Schizophrenia: Subtype Differences in Left Hemisphere Dominance for Dichotic Fused Words. American Journal of Psychiatry. 158(9). 1437–1440. 16 indexed citations
5.
Tenke, Craig E., et al.. (2000). Electroencephalographic asymmetries in adolescents with major depression: Influence of comorbidity with anxiety disorders.. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 109(4). 797–802. 121 indexed citations
6.
Bruder, Gerard E., Craig E. Tenke, Jonathan W. Stewart, Patrick J. McGrath, & F M Quitkin. (1999). Predictors of Therapeutic Response to Treatments for Depression: A Review of Electrophysiologic and Dichotic Listening Studies. CNS Spectrums. 4(8). 30–36. 8 indexed citations
7.
Erhan, Hulya M., Joan C. Borod, Craig E. Tenke, & Gerard E. Bruder. (1998). Identification of Emotion in a Dichotic Listening Task: Event-Related Brain Potential and Behavioral Findings. Brain and Cognition. 37(2). 286–307. 76 indexed citations
8.
Bruder, Gerard E., Jonathan W. Stewart, Mary A. Mercier, Vito Agosti, & et al. (1997). Outcome of cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression: Relation to hemispheric dominance for verbal processing.. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 106(1). 138–144. 25 indexed citations
9.
Bruder, Gerard E., Regan Fong, Craig E. Tenke, et al.. (1997). Regional brain asymmetries in major depression with or without an anxiety disorder: A quantitative electroencephalographic study. Biological Psychiatry. 41(9). 939–948. 294 indexed citations
10.
Yovell, Yoram, Harold A. Sackeïm, Joan Prudic, et al.. (1995). Hearing loss and asymmetry in major depression. Journal of Neuropsychiatry. 7(1). 82–89. 18 indexed citations
11.
Bruder, Gerard E., J W Stewart, James Towey, et al.. (1992). Abnormal cerebral laterality in bipolar depression: Convergence of behavioral and brain event-related potential findings. Biological Psychiatry. 32(1). 33–47. 49 indexed citations
12.
Bruder, Gerard E., J W Stewart, Martina M. Voglmaier, et al.. (1990). Cerebral laterality and depression: relations of perceptual asymmetry to outcome of treatment with tricyclic antidepressants.. PubMed. 3(1). 1–10. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026