George Wharton

499 total citations
18 papers, 196 citations indexed

About

George Wharton is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, George Wharton has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 196 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 7 papers in General Health Professions and 6 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in George Wharton's work include Organ Donation and Transplantation (8 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (6 papers) and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (3 papers). George Wharton is often cited by papers focused on Organ Donation and Transplantation (8 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (6 papers) and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (3 papers). George Wharton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. George Wharton's co-authors include Elías Mossialos, Jasmine Mah, Charlotte Johnston-Webber, Simon Streit, Vassilios Papalois, Robin van Kessel, Ilias Kyriopoulos, G. Monti, Harpreet Sood and Andrés Román-Urrestarazu and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, British journal of surgery and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

In The Last Decade

George Wharton

16 papers receiving 193 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
George Wharton United Kingdom 8 103 80 37 33 28 18 196
A. Soong Singapore 7 43 0.4× 106 1.3× 28 0.8× 76 2.3× 34 1.2× 17 303
Azar Kazemi Iran 8 45 0.4× 76 0.9× 16 0.4× 20 0.6× 3 0.1× 17 271
Andrew Broderick United Kingdom 5 99 1.0× 97 1.2× 16 0.4× 14 0.4× 9 0.3× 7 202
Erica Brownfield United States 11 86 0.8× 47 0.6× 9 0.2× 149 4.5× 55 2.0× 22 361
Matthew H V Byrne United Kingdom 8 70 0.7× 44 0.6× 5 0.1× 20 0.6× 6 0.2× 31 199
Pippa Bailey United Kingdom 11 180 1.7× 42 0.5× 16 0.4× 90 2.7× 118 4.2× 35 354
Helen Fu United States 8 45 0.4× 187 2.3× 41 1.1× 14 0.4× 2 0.1× 22 323
Kate O’Connor United States 7 176 1.7× 63 0.8× 6 0.2× 59 1.8× 120 4.3× 9 244
Magdalena Skrybant United Kingdom 8 66 0.6× 75 0.9× 18 0.5× 22 0.7× 21 242
Anne Taylor United Kingdom 10 84 0.8× 118 1.5× 18 0.5× 13 0.4× 34 287

Countries citing papers authored by George Wharton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Wharton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Wharton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Wharton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Wharton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Wharton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Wharton. The network helps show where George Wharton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Wharton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Wharton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Wharton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Wharton. George Wharton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Wharton, George, David C. Jones, & R. A. Yates. (2025). From missions to systems: rethinking international surgical support in low- and middle-income countries. British journal of surgery. 112(Supplement_15). xv15–xv17.
2.
Johnston-Webber, Charlotte, George Wharton, Robin van Kessel, et al.. (2024). A conceptual framework to assess the health, socioeconomic and environmental burden of chronic kidney disease. Health Policy. 152. 105244–105244. 2 indexed citations
3.
Kessel, Robin van, Divya Srivastava, Ilias Kyriopoulos, et al.. (2023). Digital Health Reimbursement Strategies of 8 European Countries and Israel: Scoping Review and Policy Mapping. JMIR mhealth and uhealth. 11. e49003–e49003. 38 indexed citations
4.
Streit, Simon, Charlotte Johnston-Webber, Jasmine Mah, et al.. (2023). Lessons From the Portuguese Solid Organ Donation and Transplantation System: Achieving Success Despite Challenging Conditions. Transplant International. 36. 11008–11008. 6 indexed citations
5.
Mah, Jasmine, Charlotte Johnston-Webber, Mirela Bušić, et al.. (2023). Organ Donation in Croatia: The Importance of a National Champion, a Comprehensive Plan, and International Collaborations. Transplant International. 36. 11011–11011. 6 indexed citations
6.
Mah, Jasmine, Charlotte Johnston-Webber, Jacopo Romagnoli, et al.. (2023). How to Structure a Successful Organ Donation and Transplantation System in Eight (Not So Easy) Steps: An Italian Case Study. Transplant International. 36. 11010–11010. 3 indexed citations
7.
Johnston-Webber, Charlotte, Jasmine Mah, Simon Streit, et al.. (2023). A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating National Organ Donation and Transplantation Programs. Transplant International. 36. 11006–11006. 7 indexed citations
8.
Johnston-Webber, Charlotte, Jasmine Mah, Simon Streit, et al.. (2023). Solid Organ Donation and Transplantation in the United Kingdom: Good Governance is Key to Success. Transplant International. 36. 11012–11012. 15 indexed citations
9.
Sánchez, Juan José García, David C. Wheeler, Stephen Brown, et al.. (2023). #4271 THE GROWING BURDEN OF CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE IN THE UK: AN IMPACT CKD ANALYSIS. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 38(Supplement_1). 3 indexed citations
10.
Sánchez, Juan José García, George Wharton, Neill Duncan, et al.. (2023). #4167 THE HEALTH, SOCIOECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF CKD IN THE UK: BUILDING A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 38(Supplement_1). 1 indexed citations
11.
Streit, Simon, Charlotte Johnston-Webber, Jasmine Mah, et al.. (2023). Ten Lessons From the Spanish Model of Organ Donation and Transplantation. Transplant International. 36. 11009–11009. 25 indexed citations
12.
Johnston-Webber, Charlotte, George Wharton, Simon Streit, et al.. (2023). The National Organ Donation and Transplantation Program in Greece: Gap Analysis and Recommendations for Change. Transplant International. 36. 11013–11013. 7 indexed citations
13.
Kessel, Robin van, Andrés Román-Urrestarazu, Michael Anderson, et al.. (2023). Mapping Factors That Affect the Uptake of Digital Therapeutics Within Health Systems: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 25. e48000–e48000. 42 indexed citations
14.
Wharton, George, et al.. (2021). Partnership in Healthcare System Sustainability and Resilience: Russian Healthcare System Analysis. Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences. 76(5S). 560–571.
15.
Wharton, George, et al.. (2020). Rebuilding Sudan's health system: opportunities and challenges. The Lancet. 395(10219). 171–173. 15 indexed citations
16.
Wharton, George, et al.. (2019). Virtual primary care: fragmentation or integration?. The Lancet Digital Health. 1(7). e330–e331. 24 indexed citations
17.
Wharton, George, et al.. (2019). Time to address the plight of the people of northeastern Syria. The Lancet. 393(10179). 1394–1396. 1 indexed citations
18.
Wharton, George. (2018). Funding the NHS: past, present and future. British Journal of Healthcare Management. 24(7). 350–352. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026