George W. Fulk
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Ecology top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lynn CyertDonald E. ParkerCraig W. CliffordBarbara MurphyRoger W. WestDavid A. GossE. W. Jameson
- Topics
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (9 papers)Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (6 papers)Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCzechia
In The Last Decade
George W. Fulk
30 papers receiving 763 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Epidemiology 385
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 336
- Ophthalmology 242
- Ecology 238
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 106
Countries citing papers authored by George W. Fulk
This map shows the geographic impact of George W. Fulk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George W. Fulk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George W. Fulk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George W. Fulk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George W. Fulk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George W. Fulk. The network helps show where George W. Fulk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George W. Fulk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George W. Fulk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George W. Fulk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George W. Fulk. George W. Fulk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 | |
| 2 | 70 | |
| 3 | Relationship between refractive status and teacher evaluations of school achievement. | 10 |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 172 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | Endotoxin concentration in contact lens storage cases. | 6 |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | A comparison of three subjective tests for astigmatism and their interexaminer reliabilities. | 4 |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | Rat damage to sugarcane in Pakistan. | 4 |
| 18 | 170 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About George W. Fulk
George W. Fulk is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Ecology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 30 papers that have together received 835 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (9 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (6 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (242 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (336 citations) and Epidemiology (385 citations). George W. Fulk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Lynn Cyert, Donald E. Parker, Craig W. Clifford, Barbara Murphy, Roger W. West, David A. Goss and E. W. Jameson. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Conservation, Journal of Zoology and Journal of Mammalogy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.