George Philip

155 total papers · 694 total citations
40 papers, 355 citations indexed

About

George Philip is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, George Philip has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 355 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in George Philip's work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (3 papers). George Philip is often cited by papers focused on Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (3 papers). George Philip collaborates with scholars based in Malaysia, United Kingdom and Canada. George Philip's co-authors include Jennifer A. Flemming, Sami Abdo Radman Al‐Dubai, John T Arokiasamy, Ankur Barua, Francisco Panizza, Maya Djerboua, R. M. Walsh, Barry Carr, Lawrence Hookey and Harriet Richardson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and The American Journal of Medicine.

In The Last Decade

George Philip

35 papers receiving 310 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
George Philip 67 50 50 48 43 40 355
Xiaolin Wang 81 1.2× 24 0.5× 30 0.6× 28 0.6× 13 0.3× 42 372
Shatdal Chaudhary 27 0.4× 5 0.1× 29 0.6× 35 0.7× 24 0.6× 39 387
Fei Yan 118 1.8× 44 0.9× 40 0.8× 13 0.3× 37 0.9× 44 307
Janet Bouttell 26 0.4× 4 0.1× 119 2.4× 58 1.2× 69 1.6× 26 315
Jonathan Pratschke 133 2.0× 27 0.5× 76 1.5× 20 0.4× 43 1.0× 45 403
Amir Khan 46 0.7× 8 0.2× 34 0.7× 47 1.0× 6 0.1× 28 295
Thomas Halvorsen 52 0.8× 19 0.4× 66 1.3× 25 0.5× 26 0.6× 25 363
Cláudia Furtado 14 0.2× 11 0.2× 29 0.6× 23 0.5× 4 0.1× 25 340
Ayesha Khan 77 1.1× 57 1.1× 28 0.6× 35 0.7× 9 0.2× 50 320
Vladimir G. Treml 54 0.8× 152 3.0× 40 0.8× 74 1.5× 38 0.9× 38 366

Countries citing papers authored by George Philip

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Philip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Philip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Philip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Philip

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Philip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Philip. The network helps show where George Philip may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Philip

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Philip. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Philip based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Philip. George Philip is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026