George J. Wilder

442 total citations
47 papers, 324 citations indexed

About

George J. Wilder is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, George J. Wilder has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 324 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 33 papers in Plant Science and 12 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in George J. Wilder's work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (28 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (13 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (12 papers). George J. Wilder is often cited by papers focused on Plant Diversity and Evolution (28 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (13 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (12 papers). George J. Wilder collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. George J. Wilder's co-authors include Barry E. Hammel, P. B. Tomlinson, Jeffrey R. Johansen, John Kartesz and Geoffrey A. Levin and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Botany, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden and Castanea.

In The Last Decade

George J. Wilder

42 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

George J. Wilder
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 256
  • Plant Science 161
  • Molecular Biology 123
  • Food Science 40
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 33
Replace A. O. Chater with:
A. O. Chater United Kingdom
Carroll E. Wood United States
Asa Gray Australia
J. A. Leussink Netherlands
John William Dawson New Zealand
Barbara Turner Austria
C. Grey-Wilson United States
G. Clausing Germany
R C Carolin Australia
Wilfried Stubbe Germany
A. O. Chater United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to George J. Wilder
George J. Wilder · 1×
Citations per year, relative to George J. Wilder
George J. Wilder · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by George J. Wilder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George J. Wilder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George J. Wilder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George J. Wilder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George J. Wilder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George J. Wilder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George J. Wilder. The network helps show where George J. Wilder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George J. Wilder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George J. Wilder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George J. Wilder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George J. Wilder. George J. Wilder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 6
4
New records of vascular plants for Ohio and Cuyahoga County, Ohio. II.
5
5
A Floristic Study of Fawn Pond and Surrounding Territory (Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area and Brecksville, Ohio)
2
6 1
7 5
8 3
9 4
10 4
11 5
12 7
13 8
14 5
15 7
16 9
17 14
18 20
19 5
20 20

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026