George J. Andersen

3.8k total citations
105 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

George J. Andersen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, George J. Andersen has authored 105 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 69 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 34 papers in Social Psychology and 27 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in George J. Andersen's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (64 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (25 papers) and Traffic and Road Safety (22 papers). George J. Andersen is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (64 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (25 papers) and Traffic and Road Safety (22 papers). George J. Andersen collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Japan. George J. Andersen's co-authors include Myron L. Braunstein, Paul Atchley, Rui Ni, Arthur F. Kramer, Brian P. Dyre, Asad Saidpour, Denton DeLoss, Takeo Watanabe, Julie Kang and Russell S. Pierce and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Psychological Bulletin and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

George J. Andersen

105 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
George J. Andersen United States 36 2.2k 681 512 423 354 105 3.0k
John P. Wann United Kingdom 40 2.6k 1.2× 1.0k 1.5× 394 0.8× 392 0.9× 283 0.8× 114 4.4k
Daniel Mestre France 29 1.5k 0.7× 528 0.8× 225 0.4× 159 0.4× 123 0.3× 113 2.5k
James R. Tresilian Australia 34 3.1k 1.5× 858 1.3× 202 0.4× 106 0.3× 196 0.6× 99 3.7k
Herschel W. Leibowitz United States 37 2.3k 1.1× 781 1.1× 240 0.5× 161 0.4× 560 1.6× 117 3.7k
Kathleen A. Turano United States 30 1.3k 0.6× 296 0.4× 232 0.5× 415 1.0× 859 2.4× 59 2.9k
D. Regan Canada 40 4.7k 2.2× 529 0.8× 562 1.1× 199 0.5× 1.1k 3.1× 116 5.7k
Brett R. Fajen United States 28 1.5k 0.7× 873 1.3× 398 0.8× 189 0.4× 46 0.1× 86 3.0k
Jean‐Louis Vercher France 34 2.5k 1.2× 721 1.1× 109 0.2× 83 0.2× 77 0.2× 105 3.3k
Jacques Droulez France 22 782 0.4× 230 0.3× 243 0.5× 115 0.3× 127 0.4× 68 1.4k
J.E. Bos Netherlands 33 1.3k 0.6× 929 1.4× 195 0.4× 187 0.4× 78 0.2× 126 3.4k

Countries citing papers authored by George J. Andersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George J. Andersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George J. Andersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George J. Andersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George J. Andersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George J. Andersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George J. Andersen. The network helps show where George J. Andersen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George J. Andersen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George J. Andersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George J. Andersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George J. Andersen. George J. Andersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Watanabe, Takeo, et al.. (2020). Role of endogenous and exogenous attention in task-relevant visual perceptual learning. PLoS ONE. 15(8). e0237912–e0237912. 10 indexed citations
2.
Pierce, Russell S. & George J. Andersen. (2014). The effects of age and workload on 3D spatial attention in dual-task driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 67. 96–104. 15 indexed citations
3.
DeLoss, Denton, Takeo Watanabe, & George J. Andersen. (2013). Optimization of perceptual learning: Effects of task difficulty and external noise in older adults. Vision Research. 99. 37–45. 20 indexed citations
4.
Zhang, Junjun, Myron L. Braunstein, & George J. Andersen. (2012). Effects of changes in size, speed, and distance on the perception of curved 3-D trajectories. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 75(1). 68–82. 4 indexed citations
5.
Andersen, George J.. (2012). Aging and vision: changes in function and performance from optics to perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science. 3(3). 403–410. 97 indexed citations
6.
Pierce, Russell S., et al.. (2011). Age-Related Limits of 3D Spatial Attention in Dual-Task Driving. 2 indexed citations
7.
Andersen, George J., et al.. (2011). Aging, perceptual learning, and changes in efficiency of motion processing. Vision Research. 61. 144–156. 42 indexed citations
8.
Ni, Rui, Lin Chen, & George J. Andersen. (2010). Visual constraints for the perception of quantitative depth from temporal interocular unmatched features. Vision Research. 50(16). 1571–1580. 1 indexed citations
9.
Ni, Ruiqing, et al.. (2010). Detection of imminent collisions by drivers with Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease: A preliminary study. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 42(3). 852–858. 25 indexed citations
10.
Ni, Rui, Julie Kang, & George J. Andersen. (2010). Age-related declines in car following performance under simulated fog conditions. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 42(3). 818–826. 60 indexed citations
11.
Andersen, George J., et al.. (2006). Aging and the detection of observer and moving object collisions.. Psychology and Aging. 21(1). 74–85. 56 indexed citations
12.
Braunstein, Myron L., et al.. (2005). The ground dominance effect in the perception of 3-D layout. Perception & Psychophysics. 67(5). 802–815. 58 indexed citations
13.
Braunstein, Myron L., et al.. (2002). Propagation of Depth Information from Local Regions in 3-D Scenes. Perception. 31(9). 1047–1059. 1 indexed citations
14.
Andersen, George J., et al.. (2001). Perceptual information and attentional constraints in visual search of collision events.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 27(5). 1039–1056. 18 indexed citations
15.
Saidpour, Asad, et al.. (2001). Perceived Depth of 3-D Objects in 3-D Scenes. Perception. 30(6). 681–692. 5 indexed citations
16.
Atchley, Paul, George J. Andersen, & Andreas Wüestefeld. (1998). Cooperativity, priming, and 3-D surface detection from optic flow. Perception & Psychophysics. 60(6). 981–992. 9 indexed citations
17.
Andersen, George J. & Paul Atchley. (1997). Smoothness of the velocity field and three-dimensional surface detection from optic flow. Perception & Psychophysics. 59(3). 358–369. 4 indexed citations
18.
Dyre, Brian P. & George J. Andersen. (1997). Image velocity magnitudes and perception of heading.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 23(2). 546–565. 39 indexed citations
19.
Atchley, Paul & George J. Andersen. (1995). Discrimination of speed distributions: Sensitivity to statistical properties. Vision Research. 35(22). 3131–3144. 37 indexed citations
20.
Andersen, George J. & Paul Atchley. (1995). Age-related differences in the detection of three-dimensional surfaces from optic flow.. Psychology and Aging. 10(4). 650–658. 58 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026