George Hoberg
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kathryn HarrisonGuillaume Peterson St‐LaurentShannon HagermanBenjamin CashoreJeremy RaynerMichael HowlettJeffrey PhillipsRobert Kozak
- Topics
- Forest Management and Policy (16 papers)Regulation and Compliance Studies (8 papers)Policy Transfer and Learning (7 papers)
In The Last Decade
George Hoberg
49 papers receiving 765 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Global and Planetary Change 323
- Political Science and International Relations 278
- Sociology and Political Science 215
- Strategy and Management 183
- Economics and Econometrics 127
Countries citing papers authored by George Hoberg
This map shows the geographic impact of George Hoberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Hoberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Hoberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Hoberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Hoberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Hoberg. The network helps show where George Hoberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Hoberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Hoberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Hoberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Hoberg. George Hoberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | Comparative Pipeline Politics: Oil Sands Pipeline Controversies in Canada and the United States | 6 |
| 9 | Green Energy Politics in Canada: Comparing Electricity Policies in BC and Ontario | 1 |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | Essay-Science, Politics, and U.S. Forest Service Law: The Battle over the Forest Service Planning Rule | 12 |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 75 |
About George Hoberg
George Hoberg is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Global and Planetary Change and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 50 papers that have together received 892 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Management and Policy (16 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (8 papers) and Policy Transfer and Learning (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (59 citations), Global and Planetary Change (323 citations) and Strategy and Management (183 citations). George Hoberg has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Peru and Malawi. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn Harrison, Guillaume Peterson St‐Laurent, Shannon Hagerman, Benjamin Cashore, Jeremy Rayner, Michael Howlett, Jeffrey Phillips, Robert Kozak, Harry W. Nelson and Caren C. Dymond. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, PLoS ONE and Journal of Environmental Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.