George Hoberg

1.4k total citations
50 papers, 892 citations indexed

About

George Hoberg is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Strategy and Management and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, George Hoberg has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 892 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 17 papers in Strategy and Management and 13 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in George Hoberg's work include Forest Management and Policy (16 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (8 papers) and Policy Transfer and Learning (7 papers). George Hoberg is often cited by papers focused on Forest Management and Policy (16 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (8 papers) and Policy Transfer and Learning (7 papers). George Hoberg collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Malawi and France. George Hoberg's co-authors include Kathryn Harrison, Guillaume Peterson St‐Laurent, Shannon Hagerman, Jeremy Rayner, Benjamin Cashore, Michael Howlett, Jeffrey Phillips, Caren C. Dymond, Robert Kozak and Peggy Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, PLoS ONE and Journal of Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

George Hoberg

49 papers receiving 765 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
George Hoberg Canada	21	323	278	215	183	127	50	892
Peter Knoepfel Switzerland	14	281 0.9×	277 1.0×	277 1.3×	89 0.5×	133 1.0×	68	910
Lennart J. Lundqvist Sweden	20	295 0.9×	248 0.9×	282 1.3×	124 0.7×	243 1.9×	57	1.2k
Ingemar Eländer Sweden	19	387 1.2×	233 0.8×	440 2.0×	63 0.3×	176 1.4×	66	1.2k
Jean‐David Gerber Switzerland	19	378 1.2×	159 0.6×	221 1.0×	60 0.3×	204 1.6×	58	1.1k
Stéphane Nahrath Switzerland	13	201 0.6×	151 0.5×	215 1.0×	146 0.8×	117 0.9×	63	762
James Meadowcroft United Kingdom	8	290 0.9×	163 0.6×	232 1.1×	61 0.3×	145 1.1×	13	758
Mee Kam Ng Hong Kong	24	225 0.7×	384 1.4×	397 1.8×	44 0.2×	195 1.5×	86	1.4k
Thomas C. Beierle United States	8	432 1.3×	118 0.4×	403 1.9×	80 0.4×	136 1.1×	14	1.1k
Ching‐Ping Tang United States	16	77 0.2×	188 0.7×	208 1.0×	124 0.7×	123 1.0×	31	680
Gustavo García-López United States	21	442 1.4×	146 0.5×	289 1.3×	93 0.5×	95 0.7×	38	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by George Hoberg

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Hoberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Hoberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Hoberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Hoberg

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Hoberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Hoberg. The network helps show where George Hoberg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Hoberg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Hoberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Hoberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Hoberg. George Hoberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Hoberg, George. (2021). The Resistance Dilemma. The MIT Press eBooks. 5 indexed citations

St‐Laurent, Guillaume Peterson, George Hoberg, Stephen R.J. Sheppard, & Shannon Hagerman. (2020). Designing and evaluating analytic-deliberative engagement processes for natural resources management. Elementa Science of the Anthropocene. 8. 5 indexed citations

St‐Laurent, Guillaume Peterson, Shannon Hagerman, Robert Kozak, & George Hoberg. (2018). Public perceptions about climate change mitigation in British Columbia's forest sector. PLoS ONE. 13(4). e0195999–e0195999. 27 indexed citations

St‐Laurent, Guillaume Peterson, Shannon Hagerman, & George Hoberg. (2017). Barriers to the development of forest carbon offsetting: Insights from British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Environmental Management. 203(Pt 1). 208–217. 31 indexed citations

Hoberg, George. (2013). The Battle Over Oil Sands Access to Tidewater: A Political Risk Analysis of Pipeline Alternatives. Canadian Public Policy. 39(3). 371–392. 30 indexed citations

Hoberg, George & Ian Rowlands. (2012). Green Energy Politics in Canada: Comparing Electricity Policies in BC and Ontario. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Hoberg, George, et al.. (2012). Comparative Pipeline Politics: Oil Sands Pipeline Controversies in Canada and the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations

Hoberg, George & Jeffrey Phillips. (2011). Playing Defence: Early Responses to Conflict Expansion in the Oil Sands Policy Subsystem. Canadian Journal of Political Science. 44(3). 507–527. 23 indexed citations

Hoberg, George, et al.. (2006). Equal Partners? Assessing Comanagement of Forest Resources in Clayoquot Sound. Society & Natural Resources. 19(10). 875–888. 25 indexed citations

10.

Hoberg, George. (2004). Essay-Science, Politics, and U.S. Forest Service Law: The Battle over the Forest Service Planning Rule. SSRN Electronic Journal. 12 indexed citations

11.

Hoberg, George, et al.. (2004). Protecting culturally significant areas through watershed planning in Clayoquot Sound. The Forestry Chronicle. 80(2). 229–240. 3 indexed citations

12.

Hoberg, George. (2001). Globalization and policy convergence: Symposium overview. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice. 3(2). 127–132. 26 indexed citations

13.

Hoberg, George, et al.. (1997). Policy change through sector intersection: forest and aboriginal policy in Clayoquot Sound. Canadian Public Administration. 40(3). 387–414. 32 indexed citations

14.

Harrison, Kathryn & George Hoberg. (1996). In Defence of Regulation: A Rejoinder to Benoît Laplante. Canadian Public Policy. 22(2). 180–180. 1 indexed citations

15.

Harrison, Kathryn, et al.. (1996). Risk, Science, and Politics: Regulating Toxic Substances in Canada and the United States. Canadian Public Policy. 22(2). 185–185. 30 indexed citations

16.

Harrison, Kathryn & George Hoberg. (1994). Risk, Science, and Politics. McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks. 32 indexed citations

17.

Hoberg, George, et al.. (1994). Risk, Science, and Politics. McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks. 5 indexed citations

18.

Hoberg, George & Kathryn Harrison. (1994). It's Not Easy Being Green: The Politics of Canada's Green Plan. Canadian Public Policy. 20(2). 119–119. 28 indexed citations

19.

Hoberg, George. (1991). Sleeping with an Elephant: The American Influence on Canadian Environmental Regulation. Journal of Public Policy. 11(1). 107–131. 75 indexed citations

20.

Hoberg, George. (1990). Reaganism, pluralism, and the politics of pesticide regulation. Policy Sciences. 23(4). 257–289. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact