Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning /
Countries citing papers authored by George H. Stankey
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of George H. Stankey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George H. Stankey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George H. Stankey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George H. Stankey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George H. Stankey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George H. Stankey. The network helps show where George H. Stankey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George H. Stankey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George H. Stankey.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George H. Stankey based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with George H. Stankey. George H. Stankey is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Allan, Catherine & George H. Stankey. (2009). Adaptive Environmental Management: A Practitioner's Guide. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).77 indexed citations
2.
Stankey, George H., et al.. (2008). Assessing and evaluating recreational uses of water resources in the Pacific Northwest: a review and synthesis.. 61–116.1 indexed citations
Clark, R. N., et al.. (1999). From new perspectives to ecosystem management: a social science perspective on forest management.. 73–84.4 indexed citations
8.
Stankey, George H.. (1989). Beyond the Campfire's Light: Historical Roots of the Wilderness Concept. Natural resources journal. 29(1). 9.15 indexed citations
Clark, R. Nolan, et al.. (1980). Predicting impact of noise on recreationists..18 indexed citations
15.
Stankey, George H. & John Baden. (1977). Rationing wilderness use.1 indexed citations
16.
Clark, R. N. & George H. Stankey. (1976). Analyzing Public Input to Resource Decisions: Criteria, Principles and Case Examples of the Codinvolve System. Natural resources journal. 16(1). 213.8 indexed citations
17.
Stankey, George H., Robert Lucas, & David W. Lime. (1976). Crowding in Parks and Wilderness..14 indexed citations
18.
Stankey, George H., John C. Hendee, & R. N. Clark. (1975). APPLIED SOCIAL RESEARCH CAN IMPROVE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN RESOURCE DECISION MAKING. Rural Sociology. 40(1). 67–74.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.