Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Rising Rate of Rural Hospital Closures
2015274 citationsGeorge M. Holmes, George H. Pink et al.The Journal of Rural Healthprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by George H. Pink
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of George H. Pink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George H. Pink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George H. Pink more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George H. Pink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George H. Pink. The network helps show where George H. Pink may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George H. Pink
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George H. Pink.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George H. Pink based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with George H. Pink. George H. Pink is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Żelman, William N., et al.. (2003). Use of the balanced scorecard in health care.. PubMed. 29(4). 1–16.157 indexed citations
15.
Pink, George H., et al.. (2000). Developing guidelines for allocating catheterization laboratory resources: lessons from an Ontario Consensus Panel. Consensus Panel on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Services in Ontario and the Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario.. PubMed. 16(1). 49–57.4 indexed citations
16.
Persaud, D. David, Rhonda Cockerill, George H. Pink, & Graham E. Trope. (1999). Determining Ontario's supply and requirements for ophthalmologists in 2000 and 2005: 1. Methods.. PubMed. 34(2). 74–81.5 indexed citations
17.
Persaud, D. David, Rhonda Cockerill, George H. Pink, & Graham E. Trope. (1999). Determining Ontario's supply and requirements for ophthalmologists in 2000 and 2005: 2. A comparison of projected supply and requirements.. PubMed. 34(2). 82–7.9 indexed citations
Leonard, Kevin J., Joecelyn Kirani Tan, & George H. Pink. (1998). Designing health care information systems for integrated delivery systems: where we are and where we need to be.. PubMed. 19(1). 19–30.4 indexed citations
20.
Pink, George H., et al.. (1994). Physicians in health care management: 3. Case Mix Groups and Resource Intensity Weights: an overview for physicians.. PubMed. 150(6). 889–94.62 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.