George F. Brooks
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Microbiology top 1%
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Immunology
- Co-authors
- Karen IsraelA. Clinton WhiteJan SchwarzCarol A. KauffmanJames W. SmithJ. F. JamesDeborah DraperC. J. Lammel
- Topics
- Reproductive tract infections research (10 papers)Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (7 papers)Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers)
- Cited by
- MicrobiologyInfectious Diseases
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
George F. Brooks
21 papers receiving 848 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Epidemiology 398
- Microbiology 313
- Infectious Diseases 236
- Molecular Biology 120
- Immunology 110
Countries citing papers authored by George F. Brooks
This map shows the geographic impact of George F. Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George F. Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George F. Brooks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George F. Brooks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George F. Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George F. Brooks. The network helps show where George F. Brooks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George F. Brooks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George F. Brooks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George F. Brooks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George F. Brooks. George F. Brooks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jawetz, Melnick & Adelberg's Medical Microbiology | 250 |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 32 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 46 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | Primary isolation of a new strain of the TATLOCK/Pittsburgh pneumonia agent (Legionella micdadei). | 7 |
| 10 | 107 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | Immunobiology of Neisseria gonorrhoeae : proceedings of a conference held in San Francisco, California, 18-20 January 1978 | 1 |
| 13 | 178 | |
| 14 | 54 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 34 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | Diphtheria deaths in the United States, 1959-1970. | 22 |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About George F. Brooks
George F. Brooks is a scholar working on Microbiology, Microbiology and Endocrinology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive tract infections research (10 papers), Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (7 papers) and Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (313 citations), Microbiology (14 citations) and Infectious Diseases (236 citations). George F. Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Karen Israel, A. Clinton White, Jan Schwarz, Carol A. Kauffman, James W. Smith, J. F. James, Deborah Draper, C. J. Lammel, B H Petersen and W K Hadley. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Infectious Diseases, Journal of Bacteriology and The American Journal of Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.