Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by George E. Rayment
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of George E. Rayment's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George E. Rayment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George E. Rayment more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George E. Rayment
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George E. Rayment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George E. Rayment. The network helps show where George E. Rayment may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George E. Rayment
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George E. Rayment.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George E. Rayment based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with George E. Rayment. George E. Rayment is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rayment, George E.. (2006). Australasian Soil and Plant Analysis Council Inc. (ASPAC) Submission to the Standards and Accreditation Study by the Productivity Commission into the Australian Government's Relationship with Standards Australia Limited and the National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA).2 indexed citations
Baker, Joseph T., Miles Furnas, Amy C. Johnson, et al.. (2003). A report on the study of land-sourced pollutants and their impacts on water quality in and adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef: an assessment to guide the development of management plans to halt any decline in the water quality of river catchments draining to the Reef, as a result of land-based pollution, and to achieve the long-term goal of reversing any trend in declining water quality. Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries).1 indexed citations
10.
Rayment, George E., et al.. (2003). STOCKPILED MILL MUD/ASH: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS AND CHANGES IN NUTRIENT VALUE WITH AGE.3 indexed citations
Bonnett, Graham D., et al.. (2002). Biological oxygen demand and sugars in irrigation water runoff from sugarcane fields.. 297–303.10 indexed citations
13.
Rayment, George E. & D. M. Hogarth. (2001). Minimising environmental risks from metals, pesticides, waste recycling and acid sulfate soils.. 123–126.2 indexed citations
14.
Nielsen, Peter, et al.. (2001). Achieving self-regulation for drain maintenance in the NSW sugar industry.. 51–57.11 indexed citations
15.
Rayment, George E., et al.. (1996). Downstream Effects of Land Use. Acquire (CQUniversity).84 indexed citations
Rayment, George E. & K. R. Helyar. (1980). Estimation of maintenance fertilizer needs.. Tropical grasslands. 14(3). 210–217.5 indexed citations
19.
Rayment, George E., et al.. (1980). Soil manganese tests and the comparative tolerance of Kikuyu and white clover to manganese toxicity.. Tropical grasslands. 14(2). 105–114.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.