Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by George E. Johnson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of George E. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George E. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George E. Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George E. Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George E. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George E. Johnson. The network helps show where George E. Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George E. Johnson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George E. Johnson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George E. Johnson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with George E. Johnson. George E. Johnson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Johnson, George E., et al.. (2016). The Potential Impact of Employment Policy on the Unemployment Rate Consistent with Nonaccelerating Inflation. American Economic Review. 69(2). 119–123.2 indexed citations
Johnson, George E., et al.. (2009). Strength Training: Institutes Pump up Teachers' Roles as Instructional Leaders.. The Journal of staff development. 30(4). 20.1 indexed citations
9.
Johnson, George E., et al.. (2005). Learning throughout the Day.. Educational leadership. 63(1). 59–63.4 indexed citations
Johnson, George E. & Frank P. Stafford. (1999). The labor market implications of international trade. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 2215–2288.16 indexed citations
12.
Bound, John & George E. Johnson. (1995). What Are the Causes of Rising Wage Inequality in the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1(1). 9–17.12 indexed citations
13.
Stafford, Frank P. & George E. Johnson. (1993). International competition and real wages. American Economic Review. 83(2). 127–130.34 indexed citations
14.
Johnson, George E. & Gary Solon. (1986). Estimates of the Direct Effects of Comparable Worth Policy. American Economic Review. 76(5). 1117–1125.101 indexed citations
15.
Johnson, George E.. (1985). The Economic Theory of Trade Unions-An Introductory Survey: Comment. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 87(2). 194–196.1 indexed citations
16.
Johnson, George E.. (1983). Intermetropolitan Wage Differentials in the United States. NBER Chapters. 309–332.5 indexed citations
17.
Johnson, George E. & Frank P. Stafford. (1977). The Earnings and Promotion of Women Faculty: Reply. American Economic Review. 67(2). 214–217.4 indexed citations
18.
Johnson, George E.. (1975). Economic Analysis of Trade Unionism. American Economic Review. 65(2). 23–28.72 indexed citations
19.
Johnson, George E. & Frank P. Stafford. (1974). The earnings and promotion of women faculty. American Economic Review. 64(6). 888–903.109 indexed citations
20.
Ashenfelter, Orley & George E. Johnson. (1969). Bargaining theory trade unions, & industorial strike activity. American Economic Review. 59(1). 35–49.319 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.