Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by George E. Cooper
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of George E. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George E. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George E. Cooper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George E. Cooper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George E. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George E. Cooper. The network helps show where George E. Cooper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George E. Cooper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George E. Cooper.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George E. Cooper based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with George E. Cooper. George E. Cooper is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Billings, Charles E., et al.. (1976). Retrospective studies of operating problems in air transport. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 416. 585.
9.
Palmer, Everett, et al.. (1973). Initial flight and simulator evaluation of a head up display for standard and noise abatement visual approaches. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
Cooper, George E., et al.. (1967). A piloted simulation study of operational aspects of the stall pitch-up. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).3 indexed citations
12.
Cooper, George E., et al.. (1965). Simulator Studies of the Deep Stall. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 83. 101.5 indexed citations
13.
Cooper, George E.. (1963). THE USE OF PILOTED FLIGHT SIMULATORS IN TAKE-OFF AND LANDING RESEARCH,. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).5 indexed citations
14.
Cooper, George E., et al.. (1962). ASSESSMENT OF CRITICAL PROBLEM AREAS OF THE SUPERSONIC TRANSPORT BY MEANS OF PILOTED SIMULATORS. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).2 indexed citations
Cooper, George E., et al.. (1958). AN EVALUATION OF THE FACTORS WHICH INFLUENCE THE SELECTION OF LANDING APPROACH SPEEDS. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).4 indexed citations
17.
Stewart, John, et al.. (1957). Analytical study of the comparative pitch-up behavior of several airplanes and correlation with pilot opinion. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).1 indexed citations
18.
Cooper, George E., et al.. (1955). Flight Calibration of Four Airspeed Systems on a Swept-wing Airplane at Mach Numbers up to 1.04 by the NACA Radar-phototheodolite Method. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.