George C. Williams
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.05%
- Genetics top 0.2%
- Ecology top 0.2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- Aging top 0.05%
- Co-authors
- Randolph M. NesseMark PagelMark WilliamsonRichard K. KoehnRandy PauschJeffry B. MittonDennis R. ProffíttPeter Taylor
- Topics
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies (10 papers)Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (10 papers)Plant and animal studies (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSweden
In The Last Decade
George C. Williams
88 papers receiving 12.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 199
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 4.9k
- Genetics 3.9k
- Ecology 3.6k
- Sociology and Political Science 2.1k
- Aging 1.9k
Countries citing papers authored by George C. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of George C. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George C. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George C. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George C. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George C. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George C. Williams. The network helps show where George C. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George C. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George C. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George C. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George C. Williams. George C. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Adaptation and Natural Selectionbreakdown → | 854 |
| 3 | 138 | |
| 4 | Warum wir krank werden : die Antworten der Evolutionsmedizin | 0 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | A Conversation with George C. Williams. | 2 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 57 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | The Dawn of Darwinian Medicinebreakdown → | 490 |
| 14 | 109 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 330 | |
| 18 | 109 | |
| 19 | PLEIOTROPY, NATURAL SELECTION, AND THE EVOLUTION OF SENESCENCEbreakdown → | 3066 |
| 20 | Pleiotropy, Natural Selection, and the Evolution of Senescencebreakdown → | 1245 |
About George C. Williams
George C. Williams is a scholar working on Physiology, Aquatic Science and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 91 papers that have together received 14.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (10 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (10 papers) and Plant and animal studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (1.9k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (4.9k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.8k citations). George C. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Randolph M. Nesse, Mark Pagel, Mark Williamson, Richard K. Koehn, Randy Pausch, Jeffry B. Mitton, Dennis R. Proffítt, Peter Taylor, Matthew J. Conway and John Viega. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.