Geoffrey N. Askin
- Surgery top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Genetics
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Clayton J. AdamMaree T. IzattRobert D. LabromMark J. PearcyJ. Paige LittleRobert G. ThompsonPaul S. D’UrsoRussell J. Crawford
- Topics
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (60 papers)Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (56 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (30 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Geoffrey N. Askin
76 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Surgery 886
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 398
- Biomedical Engineering 240
- Genetics 125
- Cognitive Neuroscience 58
Countries citing papers authored by Geoffrey N. Askin
This map shows the geographic impact of Geoffrey N. Askin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoffrey N. Askin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoffrey N. Askin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geoffrey N. Askin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoffrey N. Askin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoffrey N. Askin. The network helps show where Geoffrey N. Askin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geoffrey N. Askin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geoffrey N. Askin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geoffrey N. Askin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geoffrey N. Askin. Geoffrey N. Askin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | MRI reveals individual level deformities in the growing scoliotic spine that clinically are masked by the Cobb angle | 1 |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | The effect of testing protocol on immature bovine thoracic spine segment stiffness | 1 |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | Investigating the change in three dimensional deformity for idiopathic scoliosis using axially loaded MRI | 8 |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 70 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 57 | |
| 20 | 39 |
About Geoffrey N. Askin
Geoffrey N. Askin is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (60 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (56 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (30 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (398 citations), Surgery (886 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (240 citations). Geoffrey N. Askin has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Clayton J. Adam, Maree T. Izatt, Robert D. Labrom, Mark J. Pearcy, J. Paige Little, Robert G. Thompson, Paul S. D’Urso, Russell J. Crawford, John K. Webb and Caroline A. Grant. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.