Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Daily sunscreen application and betacarotene supplementation in prevention of basal-cell and squamous-cell carcinomas of the skin: a randomised controlled trial
1999667 citationsAdèle C. Green, Gail Williams et al.The Lancetprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Geoffrey C. Marks
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Geoffrey C. Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoffrey C. Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoffrey C. Marks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geoffrey C. Marks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoffrey C. Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoffrey C. Marks. The network helps show where Geoffrey C. Marks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geoffrey C. Marks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geoffrey C. Marks.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geoffrey C. Marks based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Geoffrey C. Marks. Geoffrey C. Marks is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kartasurya, Martha Irene & Geoffrey C. Marks. (2009). Prevention of upper respiratory tract infection by zinc and vitamin a supplementation. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 55. 174–175.2 indexed citations
Englberger, Lois, et al.. (2005). Food Composition Data from the Federated States of Micronesia. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 37(2). 195–213.3 indexed citations
Marks, Geoffrey C., et al.. (2004). Food and nutrient consumption patterns in third trimester Thai-Muslim pregnant women in rural southern Thailand.. PubMed. 13(3). 236–41.21 indexed citations
14.
Moore, Michael, et al.. (2004). Acute cadmium chloride administration induces hepatic and renal cytochrome P450 2A5 in the mouse. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 197(3). 272–273.1 indexed citations
15.
Satarug, Soisungwan, et al.. (2004). Modulation of cytochrome P450 monooxygenase by cadmium chloride in the mouse liver: Involvement of transcription factor NRF2. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 197(3). 268–269.1 indexed citations
Green, Adèle C., Gail Williams, Rachel Ε. Neale, et al.. (1999). Daily sunscreen application and betacarotene supplementation in prevention of basal-cell and squamous-cell carcinomas of the skin: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 354(9180). 723–729.667 indexed citations breakdown →
Heywood, Peter, Philip W. Harvey, & Geoffrey C. Marks. (1993). An evaluation of energy intakes in the 1983 Australian National Dietary Survey of Adults.. PubMed. 47(8). 604–6.21 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.