Geoffrey A. Oddie
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology top 10%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Religious studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rosane RocherHarold Coward
- Topics
- Religion, Society, and Development (10 papers)Indian History and Philosophy (8 papers)Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Geoffrey A. Oddie
29 papers receiving 114 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Sociology and Political Science 114
- Anthropology 54
- Philosophy 38
- Political Science and International Relations 35
- Religious studies 35
Countries citing papers authored by Geoffrey A. Oddie
This map shows the geographic impact of Geoffrey A. Oddie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoffrey A. Oddie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoffrey A. Oddie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geoffrey A. Oddie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoffrey A. Oddie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoffrey A. Oddie. The network helps show where Geoffrey A. Oddie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geoffrey A. Oddie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geoffrey A. Oddie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geoffrey A. Oddie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geoffrey A. Oddie. Geoffrey A. Oddie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Imagined Hinduism: British Protestant Missionary Constructions of Hinduism, 1793 - 1900 | 37 |
| 7 | Missionary Women: Gender, Professionalism and the Victorian Idea of Christian Mission | 3 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Religious Conversion Movements in South Asia: Continuities and Change, 1800-1990 | 9 |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Religion in South Asia: Religious conversion and revival movements in South Asia in medieval and modern times | 17 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Geoffrey A. Oddie
Geoffrey A. Oddie is a scholar working on Religious studies, Anthropology and Philosophy, having authored 31 papers that have together received 170 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Society, and Development (10 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (8 papers) and Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (35 citations), Anthropology (54 citations) and Philosophy (38 citations). Geoffrey A. Oddie has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rosane Rocher and Harold Coward. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Pacific Affairs and Journal of the American Oriental Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.