Geoff C. Smith
- Molecular Biology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics top 5%
- Co-authors
- William BainsLidia J. NotarianniT.M. JefferiesRyan PottsFritz GrunewaldDan SegalStephen D. ArcherPeter Burkill
- Topics
- Mathematics and Applications (7 papers)History and Theory of Mathematics (6 papers)Finite Group Theory Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Geoff C. Smith
28 papers receiving 667 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Molecular Biology 273
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 129
- Reproductive Medicine 126
- Geometry and Topology 118
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 93
Countries citing papers authored by Geoff C. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Geoff C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoff C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoff C. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geoff C. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoff C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoff C. Smith. The network helps show where Geoff C. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geoff C. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geoff C. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geoff C. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geoff C. Smith. Geoff C. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | The locations of triangle centres | 2 |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 44 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 156 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Fibonacci Sequences in Finite Nilpotent Groups | 9 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 211 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Geoff C. Smith
Geoff C. Smith is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 763 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematics and Applications (7 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (6 papers) and Finite Group Theory Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (93 citations), Reproductive Medicine (126 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (16 citations). Geoff C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include William Bains, Lidia J. Notarianni, T.M. Jefferies, Ryan Potts, Fritz Grunewald, Dan Segal, Stephen D. Archer, Peter Burkill, Philip D. Nightingale and J. P. Cox. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Research Policy and Journal of Theoretical Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.