Geneva W. Chong
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.5%
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 23
- Ecological Modeling top 1%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 6
- Ecology top 1%
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 26
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 7
- Global and Planetary Change top 2%
- Fire effects on ecosystems 12
-
- Plant and animal studies 6
-
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies 7
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Thomas J. StohlgrenMohammed A. KalkhanLisa D. SchellYuka OtsukiDan BinkleyGreg NewmanMichael BashkinYowhan Son
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSlovakia
In The Last Decade
Geneva W. Chong
39 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.7k
- Ecological Modeling 442
- Ecology 1.2k
- Global and Planetary Change 830
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 735
Countries citing papers authored by Geneva W. Chong
This map shows the geographic impact of Geneva W. Chong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geneva W. Chong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geneva W. Chong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geneva W. Chong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geneva W. Chong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geneva W. Chong. The network helps show where Geneva W. Chong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Geneva W. Chong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 60 | |
| 8 | Land use and habitat conditions across the southwestern Wyoming sagebrush steppe: development impacts, management effectiveness and the distribution of invasive plants | 2011 | 3 |
| 9 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 42 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 39 | |
| 12 | Scale and plant invasions: A theory of biotic acceptance | 2006 | 173 |
| 13 | 2006 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 211 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 111 | |
| 18 | New approaches for sampling and modeling native and exotic plant species richness | 2001 | 24 |
| 19 | 2001 | 33 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 103 |
About Geneva W. Chong
Geneva W. Chong is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Ecology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rangeland and Wildlife Management (26 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (23 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (12 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.7k citations), Ecological Modeling (442 citations) and Ecology (1.2k citations). Geneva W. Chong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. Stohlgren, Mohammed A. Kalkhan, Lisa D. Schell, Yuka Otsuki, Dan Binkley, Greg Newman, Michael Bashkin, Yowhan Son, Sunil Kumar and T. J. Stohlgren. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Ecological Monographs and Journal of Applied Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.