Gene D. Berry
- Materials Chemistry
- Energy Engineering and Power Technology top 1%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Aerospace Engineering top 10%
- Catalysis top 10%
- Co-authors
- Salvador M. AcevesJesús Martínez‐FríasFrancisco Espinosa-LozaJames R. SmithR.N. SchockG.D. RambachK. McKenneyMark Paster
- Topics
- Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (9 papers)Hydrogen Storage and Materials (4 papers)Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Gene D. Berry
10 papers receiving 537 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Materials Chemistry 297
- Energy Engineering and Power Technology 242
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 161
- Aerospace Engineering 99
- Catalysis 93
Countries citing papers authored by Gene D. Berry
This map shows the geographic impact of Gene D. Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gene D. Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gene D. Berry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gene D. Berry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gene D. Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gene D. Berry. The network helps show where Gene D. Berry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gene D. Berry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gene D. Berry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gene D. Berry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gene D. Berry. Gene D. Berry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 103 | |
| 2 | 130 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | Development and Demonstration of Insulated Pressure Vessels for Vehicular Hydrogen Storage | 1 |
| 6 | Direct Carbon Conversion: Application to the Efficient Conversion of Fossil Fuels to Electricity | 8 |
| 7 | 62 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 89 | |
| 10 | 117 | |
| 11 | A smooth transition to hydrogen transportation fuel | 1 |
About Gene D. Berry
Gene D. Berry is a scholar working on Energy Engineering and Power Technology, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Automotive Engineering, having authored 11 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (9 papers), Hydrogen Storage and Materials (4 papers) and Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Energy Engineering and Power Technology (242 citations), Catalysis (93 citations) and Automotive Engineering (91 citations). Gene D. Berry has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Salvador M. Aceves, Jesús Martínez‐Frías, Francisco Espinosa-Loza, James R. Smith, R.N. Schock, G.D. Rambach, K. McKenney, Mark Paster, Stephen Lasher and Amgad Elgowainy. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Energy and Energy & Fuels.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.