Genc Burazeri
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Health top 2%
- Epidemiology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Helmut BrandEnver RoshiJeremy D. KarkErvin ToçiJaime GofinArtan GodaNaim JerliuBledar Kraja
- Topics
- Global Health Care Issues (20 papers)Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (16 papers)Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (15 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEInternational Journal of Epidemiology
- Partner nations
- AlbaniaNetherlandsTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Genc Burazeri
138 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
- General Health Professions 548
- Health 250
- Epidemiology 249
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 237
- Clinical Psychology 173
Countries citing papers authored by Genc Burazeri
This map shows the geographic impact of Genc Burazeri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Genc Burazeri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genc Burazeri more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Genc Burazeri
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Genc Burazeri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Genc Burazeri. The network helps show where Genc Burazeri may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Genc Burazeri
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Genc Burazeri. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Genc Burazeri based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Genc Burazeri. Genc Burazeri is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | Prevalence of Childhood Physical Abuse in Albania | 1 |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | Curriculum development for schools of public health. | 0 |
About Genc Burazeri
Genc Burazeri is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health and Health Information Management, having authored 163 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Care Issues (20 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (16 papers) and Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (250 citations), General Health Professions (548 citations) and Gastroenterology (79 citations). Genc Burazeri has collaborated with scholars based in Albania, Netherlands and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Helmut Brand, Enver Roshi, Jeremy D. Kark, Ervin Toçi, Jaime Gofin, Artan Goda, Naim Jerliu, Bledar Kraja, Naser Ramadani and Kristine Sørensen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and International Journal of Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.