Gena G. Foster

962 total citations · 1 hit paper
5 papers, 304 citations indexed

About

Gena G. Foster is a scholar working on Oncology, Immunology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Gena G. Foster has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 304 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Oncology, 3 papers in Immunology and 2 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Gena G. Foster's work include Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (3 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (2 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers). Gena G. Foster is often cited by papers focused on Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (3 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (2 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers). Gena G. Foster collaborates with scholars based in United States. Gena G. Foster's co-authors include Can Cui, Brittany Fitzgerald, Eric Fagerberg, Julie F. Cheung, Nikhil S. Joshi, Kelli A. Connolly, Hongyu Zhao, Shuting Chen, Martina Damo and Jiawei Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Journal of Hepatology and Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

In The Last Decade

Gena G. Foster

4 papers receiving 302 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Neoantigen-driven B cell and CD4 T follicular helper cell collaboration promotes anti-tumor CD8 T cell responses

2021 280 citations Can Cui, Jiawei Wang et al. Cell profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Gena G. Foster United States	3	209	193	83	40	36	5	304
Brittany Fitzgerald United States	3	216 1.0×	201 1.0×	89 1.1×	45 1.1×	39 1.1×	6	321
Yuki Muroyama United States	5	181 0.9×	241 1.2×	50 0.6×	52 1.3×	30 0.8×	10	330
Elise Ballot France	7	130 0.6×	148 0.8×	61 0.7×	50 1.3×	35 1.0×	10	256
Carly Cardello United States	6	200 1.0×	198 1.0×	60 0.7×	34 0.8×	32 0.9×	6	312
Xuejing Yang China	11	137 0.7×	157 0.8×	115 1.4×	47 1.2×	53 1.5×	22	294
Zelin Hou China	6	140 0.7×	157 0.8×	73 0.9×	24 0.6×	42 1.2×	9	250
Haytham El Salhat Qatar	5	267 1.3×	259 1.3×	112 1.3×	31 0.8×	39 1.1×	7	398
Lucas Blanchard United States	4	195 0.9×	180 0.9×	100 1.2×	29 0.7×	28 0.8×	9	307
Qinglin Fei China	8	185 0.9×	210 1.1×	134 1.6×	40 1.0×	52 1.4×	16	362
Tyler G. Searles United States	5	148 0.7×	169 0.9×	53 0.6×	31 0.8×	22 0.6×	7	235

Countries citing papers authored by Gena G. Foster

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gena G. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gena G. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gena G. Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gena G. Foster

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gena G. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gena G. Foster. The network helps show where Gena G. Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gena G. Foster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gena G. Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gena G. Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gena G. Foster. Gena G. Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Fitzgerald, Brittany, Kelli A. Connolly, Can Cui, et al.. (2021). A mouse model for the study of anti-tumor T cell responses in Kras-driven lung adenocarcinoma. Cell Reports Methods. 1(5). 100080–100080. 17 indexed citations

2.

Cui, Can, Jiawei Wang, Eric Fagerberg, et al.. (2021). Neoantigen-driven B cell and CD4 T follicular helper cell collaboration promotes anti-tumor CD8 T cell responses. Cell. 184(25). 6101–6118.e13. 280 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Fitzgerald, Brittany, Kelli A. Connolly, Can Cui, et al.. (2021). A Novel Mouse Model for the Study of Anti-Tumor T Cell Responses in Kras Driven Lung Adenocarcinoma. SSRN Electronic Journal.

4.

Foster, Gena G., Michael J. Grant, Samantha Thomas, et al.. (2020). Treatment with Foscarnet after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (Allo-HCT) Is Associated with Long-Term Loss of Renal Function. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 26(9). 1597–1606. 6 indexed citations

5.

Rivino, Laura, Nina Le Bert, Yating Cheng, et al.. (2016). An Immunological Biomarker to Predict Hepatic Flares upon Nuc Therapy Discontinuation in Chronic Hepatitis B. Journal of Hepatology. 64(2). S164–S165. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact