Gemma Walmsley

24 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

Gemma Walmsley
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Gastroenterology 74
  • Sensory Systems 43
  • Equine 9
  • Aging 7
  • Surgery 164
Replace D. C. Moriarty with:
D. C. Moriarty Ireland
Graham Graham United States
İbrahim Aladağ Türkiye
Atsushi Yuta Japan
Lilien Chertkoff Argentina
Thomas Pham United States
R Müller Sweden
Anjona Schmidt‐Choudhury Germany
Marie-Claire Michoud Canada
Iradj Sobhani France
Gemma Walmsley relative to D. C. Moriarty Ireland D. C. Moriarty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×25×
D. C. Moriarty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Walmsley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Walmsley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Walmsley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Walmsley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Walmsley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Walmsley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Walmsley. The network helps show where Gemma Walmsley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Walmsley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gemma Walmsley Line = papers co-authored together Gemma Walmsley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201098
2 197788
3 200657
4 197529
5 201226
6 202224
7 200522
8 201012
9 202312
10 200911
11 201111
12 200610
13 20169
14 19759
15 20198
16 20247
17 20126
18 20095
19 20245
20 20205

About Gemma Walmsley

Gemma Walmsley is a scholar working on Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Microbiology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (6 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (4 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (4 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (4 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (3 papers), Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (3 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (2 papers) and Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (74 citations), Sensory Systems (43 citations), Equine (9 citations), Aging (7 citations) and Surgery (164 citations). Gemma Walmsley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include F T de Dombal, Kate Chandler, J C Horrocks, W A McAdam, A G Morgan, Rita Gonçalves, Holger A. Volk, Thomas W. Maddox, Martyn P. Mahaut‐Smith and Nigel Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Journal of Small Animal Practice, The Veterinary Journal and Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact