Gemma Knight
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
-
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
Papers in
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 3
-
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 1
- Co-authors
- James Rucker (3 shared papers)Anthony J. Cleare (1 shared paper)Allan H. Young (2 shared papers)Catherine Bird (2 shared papers)David R. Goldsmith (1 shared paper)Luke A. Jelen (1 shared paper)Hassan Jafari (1 shared paper)Ben Carter (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Depression and Anxiety (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)Frontiers in Psychiatry (1 paper)BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine (1 paper)The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth AfricaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Gemma Knight
4 papers receiving 196 citations
Gemma Knight's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Clinical Psychology 181
- Biological Psychiatry 10
- Sensory Systems 12
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 46
- Organic Chemistry 74
Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Knight
This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Knight more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Knight
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Knight. The network helps show where Gemma Knight may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Knight, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Psychedelics, Mystical Experience, and Therapeutic Efficacy: A Systematic Review Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 160 |
| 2 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 4 | Chronic depression and drug addiction treated by stereotactic surgery. | 1969 | 9 |
| 5 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2025 | 0 |
About Gemma Knight
Gemma Knight is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Organic Chemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 6 papers that have together received 206 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (1 paper), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1 paper), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (1 paper) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (181 citations), Biological Psychiatry (10 citations), Sensory Systems (12 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (46 citations) and Organic Chemistry (74 citations). Gemma Knight has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and Australia. Frequent co-authors include James Rucker, Anthony J. Cleare, Allan H. Young, Catherine Bird, David R. Goldsmith, Luke A. Jelen, Hassan Jafari, Ben Carter, Tim Mantingh and Camilla Day. Their work appears in journals such as Depression and Anxiety, BMJ Open, Frontiers in Psychiatry, BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine and The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.