Geert‐Jan Rutten
- Genetics top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Margriet M. SitskoornKarin GehringNick F. RamseyWouter De BaeneSophie D. van der LindenJeroen B. VerheulClemens M.F. DirvenMartin J. van den Bent
- Topics
- Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (20 papers)Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (19 papers)Meningioma and schwannoma management (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsFranceGermany
In The Last Decade
Geert‐Jan Rutten
57 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Genetics 502
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 343
- Cognitive Neuroscience 333
- Epidemiology 331
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 325
Countries citing papers authored by Geert‐Jan Rutten
This map shows the geographic impact of Geert‐Jan Rutten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geert‐Jan Rutten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geert‐Jan Rutten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geert‐Jan Rutten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geert‐Jan Rutten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geert‐Jan Rutten. The network helps show where Geert‐Jan Rutten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geert‐Jan Rutten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geert‐Jan Rutten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geert‐Jan Rutten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geert‐Jan Rutten. Geert‐Jan Rutten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 217 | |
| 17 | 71 | |
| 18 | 61 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About Geert‐Jan Rutten
Geert‐Jan Rutten is a scholar working on Genetics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (20 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (19 papers) and Meningioma and schwannoma management (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (502 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (333 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (343 citations). Geert‐Jan Rutten has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Margriet M. Sitskoorn, Karin Gehring, Nick F. Ramsey, Wouter De Baene, Sophie D. van der Linden, Jeroen B. Verheul, Clemens M.F. Dirven, Martin J. van den Bent, Ruth Fleischeuer and Maarten M.J. Wijnenga. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of neurosurgery, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.