Ged Williams

1.3k total citations
72 papers, 599 citations indexed

About

Ged Williams is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Ged Williams has authored 72 papers receiving a total of 599 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in General Health Professions, 19 papers in Emergency Medicine and 15 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Ged Williams's work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (15 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (14 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (11 papers). Ged Williams is often cited by papers focused on Emergency and Acute Care Studies (15 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (14 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (11 papers). Ged Williams collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Ged Williams's co-authors include Wendy Chaboyer, Ruth Kleinpell, Laura Alberto, Shelley Schmollgruber, Paul Fulbrook, Julia Crilly, Nicos Middleton, Samuel A. Tisherman, Antonios Liolios and Julie Benbenishty and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Critical Care Medicine and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Ged Williams

65 papers receiving 552 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ged Williams Australia 13 211 153 124 108 102 72 599
Lilia de Souza Nogueira Brazil 17 224 1.1× 273 1.8× 130 1.0× 101 0.9× 110 1.1× 83 816
Matthew D. McHugh United States 13 468 2.2× 175 1.1× 103 0.8× 89 0.8× 215 2.1× 26 873
Caroline Kovacs United Kingdom 8 274 1.3× 251 1.6× 60 0.5× 77 0.7× 113 1.1× 12 641
Violet H. Barkauskas United States 14 514 2.4× 120 0.8× 99 0.8× 65 0.6× 178 1.7× 46 881
Kathleen S. Oman United States 16 237 1.1× 111 0.7× 163 1.3× 224 2.1× 31 0.3× 38 767
Patricia Folcarelli United States 15 430 2.0× 91 0.6× 174 1.4× 68 0.6× 141 1.4× 29 771
Rachel French United States 10 269 1.3× 86 0.6× 111 0.9× 43 0.4× 117 1.1× 40 557
Aaron W. Calhoun United States 16 222 1.1× 155 1.0× 268 2.2× 77 0.7× 129 1.3× 66 777
A. Warden United Kingdom 5 122 0.6× 176 1.2× 32 0.3× 61 0.6× 104 1.0× 6 507
Judy Magarey Australia 12 151 0.7× 70 0.5× 56 0.5× 89 0.8× 44 0.4× 26 604

Countries citing papers authored by Ged Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ged Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ged Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ged Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ged Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ged Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ged Williams. The network helps show where Ged Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ged Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ged Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ged Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ged Williams. Ged Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Williams, Ged, et al.. (2025). The challenges of compliance with sepsis management protocols in low and low-middle income countries − A cross-sectional study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 90. 104032–104032.
2.
O’Reilly, Gerard, et al.. (2022). Critical care nursing role in low and lower middle-income settings: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 12(1). e055585–e055585. 11 indexed citations
3.
Williams, Ged, et al.. (2022). A practical approach to establishing a critical care outreach service: An expert panel research design. Australian Critical Care. 36(1). 151–158. 6 indexed citations
4.
Krupa, Sabina, Dorota Religa, Adriano Friganović, et al.. (2022). Work climate in emergency health services during COVID-19 pandemic—An international multicenter study. Frontiers in Public Health. 10. 895506–895506. 1 indexed citations
5.
Williams, Ged & Wilson Cañón-Montañéz. (2020). COVID-19: Lo que hemos aprendido hasta ahora. Revista CUIDARTE. 11(2). 10 indexed citations
6.
Williams, Ged, et al.. (2020). Nursing Students’ Perceptions of the Dedicated Education Unit Model in 2 UAE Hospitals. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(2). 61–69. 11 indexed citations
7.
Brownie, Sharon, et al.. (2015). Pedagogy and Culture: An Educational Initiative in Supporting UAE Nursing Graduates Prepare for a High-stakes Nurse Licensing Examination. International Journal of Higher Education. 4(1). 5 indexed citations
8.
Williams, Ged & Wilson Cañón-Montañéz. (2013). LIDERAZGO INTERNACIONAL EN ENFERMERÍA. Revista CUIDARTE. 4(1). 435–436. 1 indexed citations
9.
Aitken, Leanne M., Ged Williams, Maurene A. Harvey, et al.. (2011). Nursing considerations to complement the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. Critical Care Medicine. 39(7). 1800–1818. 40 indexed citations
10.
Kleinpell, Ruth, E. Wesley Ely, Ged Williams, et al.. (2010). Web-based resources for critical care education. Critical Care Medicine. 39(3). 541–553. 47 indexed citations
11.
Williams, Ged & Patricia M. Livingston. (2007). The diversity of emergency code telephone numbers in Australian hospitals: the feasibility of an Australian standard emergency code. Australian Health Review. 31(4). 540–545. 1 indexed citations
12.
Williams, Ged, Shelley Schmollgruber, & Laura Alberto. (2006). Consensus Forum: Worldwide Guidelines on the Critical Care Nursing Workforce and Education Standards. Critical Care Clinics. 22(3). 393–406. 25 indexed citations
13.
Williams, Ged. (2004). Nursing workforce standards and planning in Australian intensive care units. 3(2). 3 indexed citations
14.
Williams, Ged, et al.. (2002). Rotavirus outbreak in central Australia. PubMed. 7(2). 51–58. 5 indexed citations
15.
Williams, Ged, et al.. (2001). A consensus driven method to measure the required number of intensive care nurses in Australia. Australian Critical Care. 14(3). 106–115. 17 indexed citations
16.
Williams, Ged, Wendy Chaboyer, & Elizabeth Patterson. (2000). Australia's Nursing Workforce in Perspective. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 30(6). 304–308. 11 indexed citations
17.
Williams, Ged, et al.. (2000). CENTRAL AUSTRALIAN NURSE MANAGEMENT MODEL (CAN MODEL): A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF REMOTE‐AREA NURSES. Australian Journal of Rural Health. 8(1). 1–5. 9 indexed citations
18.
Rogers, Anne, H. A. Elliott, Roy Carr‐Hill, et al.. (1997). Population health, pathways into primary care and the use of health care: Phase 1 - a report of reviews. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 1 indexed citations
19.
Steinberg, Marilyn, et al.. (1996). Healthy Ageing, Healthy Dying: Community and Health Professional Perspectives on end-of-life decision-making. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 73(5a). 608–13. 6 indexed citations
20.
Williams, Ged, et al.. (1984). A community training scheme in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.. BMJ. 288(6417). 617–620. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lilia de Souza Nogueira Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Matthew D. McHugh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Caroline Kovacs Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Violet H. Barkauskas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kathleen S. Oman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patricia Folcarelli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rachel French Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Aaron W. Calhoun Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Warden Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Judy Magarey
Rankless by CCL
2026