G.E. Cooper

3.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 509 citations indexed

About

G.E. Cooper is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, G.E. Cooper has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 509 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 2 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 1 paper in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in G.E. Cooper's work include Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (2 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (2 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (1 paper). G.E. Cooper is often cited by papers focused on Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (2 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (2 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (1 paper). G.E. Cooper collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. G.E. Cooper's co-authors include Ruth Tringham, George H. Odell, Barbara Voytek, Peter Martin Jacobs, Eugen Wierbicki, E. Vataga, M. Norman, S. M. Farrington, A. Robson and B. Trocmé and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Food Science, Nuclear Physics A and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

G.E. Cooper

7 papers receiving 448 citations

Hit Papers

Experimentation in the Formation of Edge Damage: A New Ap... 1974 2026 1991 2008 1974 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G.E. Cooper United States 3 371 331 235 74 29 8 509
Jenny L. Adams United States 10 316 0.9× 325 1.0× 168 0.7× 83 1.1× 22 0.8× 17 481
Patrick C. Vaughan 5 275 0.7× 274 0.8× 214 0.9× 53 0.7× 19 0.7× 6 428
Romana Unger‐Hamilton United Kingdom 8 225 0.6× 247 0.7× 156 0.7× 41 0.6× 16 0.6× 11 390
Kjel Knutsson Sweden 16 511 1.4× 503 1.5× 290 1.2× 74 1.0× 31 1.1× 62 724
Laure Dubreuil Canada 12 310 0.8× 338 1.0× 223 0.9× 65 0.9× 20 0.7× 22 466
Barbara Voytek United States 10 553 1.5× 574 1.7× 394 1.7× 92 1.2× 37 1.3× 21 811
Leland W. Patterson United States 10 242 0.7× 221 0.7× 90 0.4× 40 0.5× 51 1.8× 43 324
Philip J. Carr United States 8 307 0.8× 297 0.9× 121 0.5× 62 0.8× 56 1.9× 15 343
Daniel Cahen Belgium 10 364 1.0× 261 0.8× 148 0.6× 73 1.0× 17 0.6× 24 471
Daniel S. Amick United States 13 566 1.5× 520 1.6× 193 0.8× 103 1.4× 54 1.9× 18 651

Countries citing papers authored by G.E. Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.E. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.E. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.E. Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.E. Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.E. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.E. Cooper. The network helps show where G.E. Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G.E. Cooper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G.E. Cooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G.E. Cooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G.E. Cooper. G.E. Cooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Matthews, John, et al.. (2008). Project Same Page: An Evaluation of an Attachment Training Seminar. Journal of Public Child Welfare. 2(4). 495–509. 2 indexed citations
2.
Biery, K., et al.. (2007). NOvA DAQ, System Architecture, Data Combiner and Timing System. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 1–5. 2 indexed citations
3.
Trocmé, B., G.E. Cooper, S. M. Farrington, et al.. (2006). CDF II Production Farm Project. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 572(1). 399–401.
4.
Jacobs, Peter Martin & G.E. Cooper. (2000). Remarks on the geometry of high energy nuclear collisions. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 7(6). 548–50. 1 indexed citations
5.
Cooper, G.E.. (1999). Stopping: from peripheral to central nuclear collisions at the SPS. Nuclear Physics A. 661(1-4). 362–365. 8 indexed citations
6.
Tringham, Ruth, et al.. (1974). Experimentation in the Formation of Edge Damage: A New Approach to Lithic Analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology. 1(1-2). 171–196. 381 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Tringham, Ruth, et al.. (1974). Experimentation in the Formation of Edge Damage: A New Approach to Lithic Analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology. 1(1/2). 171–171. 113 indexed citations
8.
Wierbicki, Eugen, et al.. (1959). APPLICATION OF NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEATS RESEARCH a. Journal of Food Science. 24(2). 210–217. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026