Gary W. Knight

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 951 citations indexed

About

Gary W. Knight is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Gary W. Knight has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 951 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 2 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. Recurrent topics in Gary W. Knight's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (4 papers). Gary W. Knight is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (4 papers). Gary W. Knight collaborates with scholars based in United States and Russia. Gary W. Knight's co-authors include Avinash G. Patwardhan, Michael R. Zindrick, Stephen L. G. Rothman, Leon L. Wiltse, James C. Thomas, Mark Lorenz, Mark Sartori, Wilton H. Bunch, Robert M. Havey and Kiyoshi Kaneda and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Spine and Journal of Biomechanics.

In The Last Decade

Gary W. Knight

8 papers receiving 903 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Analysis of the Morphometric Characteristics of the Thoracic and Lumbar Pedicles

1987 396 citations Michael R. Zindrick, Leon L. Wiltse et al. Spine profile →

Peers

Gary W. Knight

SURGE

PFM

BE

OSM

REHAB

Lennart Sjöström Sweden

G. W. D. ARMSTRONG Canada

William R. Klemme United States

S Vidyadhara India

Ichiro Tonogai Japan

Roger G Wilber United States

Kouichi Arai Japan

Mark Lorenz United States

Serkan Erkan Türkiye

James M. Coumas United States

Lennart Sjöström Sweden

Gary W. Knight

666 ×0.7

SURGE

493 ×0.8

PFM

33 ×0.3

BE

31 ×0.3

OSM

57 ×0.6

REHAB

Citations per year, relative to Gary W. Knight Gary W. Knight (= 1×) peers Lennart Sjöström

Countries citing papers authored by Gary W. Knight

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gary W. Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gary W. Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gary W. Knight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gary W. Knight

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gary W. Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gary W. Knight. The network helps show where Gary W. Knight may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gary W. Knight

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gary W. Knight. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gary W. Knight based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gary W. Knight. Gary W. Knight is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Raju, Gottumukkala S., Ijaz Ahmed, Shu‐Yuan Xiao, et al.. (2006). Controlled trial of immediate endoluminal closure of colon perforations in a porcine model by use of a novel clip device (with videos). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 64(6). 989–997. 44 indexed citations

2.

Zindrick, Michael R., et al.. (2000). Pedicle Morphology of the Immature Thoracolumbar Spine. Spine. 25(21). 2726–2735. 95 indexed citations

3.

Zindrick, Michael R., Avinash G. Patwardhan, Robert M. Havey, et al.. (2000). The Biomechanical Effect of Postoperative Hypolordosis in Instrumented Lumbar Fusion on Instrumented and Adjacent Spinal Segments. Spine. 25(13). 1617–1624. 209 indexed citations

4.

Zindrick, Michael R., et al.. (1989). Factors influencing the penetration of wires into the neural canal during segmental wiring.. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 71(5). 742–750. 22 indexed citations

5.

Meade, Kevin P., Wilton H. Bunch, Ray Vanderby, Avinash G. Patwardhan, & Gary W. Knight. (1987). Progression of Unsupported Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine. 12(6). 520–526. 8 indexed citations

6.

Light, Terry R., et al.. (1987). The effect of immediate constrained digital motion on the strength of flexor tendon repairs in chickens. The Journal Of Hand Surgery. 12(4). 590–595. 146 indexed citations

7.

Zindrick, Michael R., Leon L. Wiltse, Gary W. Knight, et al.. (1987). Analysis of the Morphometric Characteristics of the Thoracic and Lumbar Pedicles. Spine. 12(2). 160–166. 396 indexed citations breakdown →

8.

Patwardhan, Avinash G., Wilton H. Bunch, Kevin P. Meade, Ray Vanderby, & Gary W. Knight. (1986). A biomechanical analog of curve progression and orthotic stabilization in idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Biomechanics. 19(2). 103–117. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact