Gao-Feng Yu

994 total citations
18 papers, 637 citations indexed

About

Gao-Feng Yu is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Control and Systems Engineering and Computational Theory and Mathematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Gao-Feng Yu has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 637 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 6 papers in Control and Systems Engineering and 3 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics. Recurrent topics in Gao-Feng Yu's work include Multi-Criteria Decision Making (14 papers), Optimization and Mathematical Programming (6 papers) and Fuzzy Systems and Optimization (3 papers). Gao-Feng Yu is often cited by papers focused on Multi-Criteria Decision Making (14 papers), Optimization and Mathematical Programming (6 papers) and Fuzzy Systems and Optimization (3 papers). Gao-Feng Yu collaborates with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and Spain. Gao-Feng Yu's co-authors include Deng-Feng Li, Wei Fei, Li Li, Quande Qin, Fuqi Liang, Yu‐Wang Chen, Jian Wu, Mingshuo Cao, Deng‐Feng Li and Decui Liang and has published in prestigious journals such as Information Sciences, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems and Applied Soft Computing.

In The Last Decade

Gao-Feng Yu

16 papers receiving 616 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Gao-Feng Yu China	12	454	159	131	96	71	18	637
Xia Liang China	14	322 0.7×	164 1.0×	127 1.0×	77 0.8×	71 1.0×	37	548
Shi-Fan He China	13	328 0.7×	145 0.9×	83 0.6×	98 1.0×	65 0.9×	23	484
Zhinan Hao China	12	454 1.0×	182 1.1×	134 1.0×	135 1.4×	104 1.5×	22	596
Qiuyan Zhong China	9	315 0.7×	111 0.7×	89 0.7×	106 1.1×	50 0.7×	30	509
Yanping Jiang China	12	615 1.4×	239 1.5×	189 1.4×	210 2.2×	109 1.5×	32	796
Qingxing Dong China	10	391 0.9×	186 1.2×	57 0.4×	86 0.9×	38 0.5×	17	715
Kai-wen Shen China	8	371 0.8×	110 0.7×	109 0.8×	83 0.9×	74 1.0×	9	531
Yating Liu China	11	467 1.0×	214 1.3×	99 0.8×	125 1.3×	63 0.9×	22	679
Min Xue China	13	286 0.6×	214 1.3×	89 0.7×	113 1.2×	37 0.5×	41	496

Countries citing papers authored by Gao-Feng Yu

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gao-Feng Yu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gao-Feng Yu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gao-Feng Yu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gao-Feng Yu

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gao-Feng Yu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gao-Feng Yu. The network helps show where Gao-Feng Yu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gao-Feng Yu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gao-Feng Yu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gao-Feng Yu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gao-Feng Yu. Gao-Feng Yu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Yu, Gao-Feng, et al.. (2025). A rational incentive mechanism driven group consensus optimization model by trust attenuation propagation with optimal path under social network. Information Sciences. 721. 122616–122616.

Yu, Gao-Feng, et al.. (2024). A novel grade assessment method for cybersecurity situation of online retailing with decision makers’ bounded rationality. Information Sciences. 667. 120476–120476. 14 indexed citations

Zheng, Zhonghua, et al.. (2024). A Hybrid Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method Considering Tourists' Behavioral Preferences for Customized Tours. International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications. 13(1). 1–13.

Yu, Gao-Feng, et al.. (2023). A Novel Variable Weight VIKOR Grade Assessment Method for Waterway Navigation Safe Routes Selection. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 11(2). 347–347. 1 indexed citations

Yu, Gao-Feng. (2023). A multi-objective decision method for the network security situation grade assessment under multi-source information. Information Fusion. 102. 102066–102066. 29 indexed citations

Wu, Jian, et al.. (2023). A bargaining game based feedback mechanism to support consensus in dynamic social network group decision making. Information Fusion. 93. 363–382. 64 indexed citations

Yu, Gao-Feng & Deng-Feng Li. (2022). A novel intuitionistic fuzzy goal programming method for heterogeneous MADM with application to regional green manufacturing level evaluation under multi-source information. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 174. 108796–108796. 21 indexed citations

Chang, Zhoulin, et al.. (2021). Design of workpiece recognition and sorting system based on deep learning. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 1802(2). 22061–22061. 2 indexed citations

Yu, Gao-Feng, Deng‐Feng Li, Decui Liang, & Guangxu Li. (2021). An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Objective Goal Programming Approach to Portfolio Selection. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. 20(5). 1477–1497. 53 indexed citations

10.

Li, Deng‐Feng, et al.. (2020). A GENERAL MULTI-ATTRIBUTE MULTI-SCALE DECISION MAKING METHOD BASED ON DYNAMIC LINMAP FOR PROPERTY PERCEIVED SERVICE QUALITY EVALUATION. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 26(5). 1052–1073. 16 indexed citations

11.

Gai, Tiantian, et al.. (2020). A joint feedback strategy for consensus in large-scale group decision making under social network. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 147. 106626–106626. 71 indexed citations

12.

Li, Deng‐Feng, et al.. (2020). EVALUATING THE COMPREHENSIVE IMPACTS OF TOURISM IN HAINAN BY INTERGRATING INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL WITH MCDM METHODS. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 26(5). 989–1029. 16 indexed citations

13.

Yu, Gao-Feng, et al.. (2020). A Minimum Trust Discount Coefficient Model for Incomplete Information in Group Decision Making with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Set. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 22(6). 2025–2040. 9 indexed citations

14.

Yu, Gao-Feng, Wei Fei, & Deng-Feng Li. (2018). A Compromise-Typed Variable Weight Decision Method for Hybrid Multiattribute Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 27(5). 861–872. 102 indexed citations

15.

Yu, Gao-Feng, Deng-Feng Li, & Wei Fei. (2018). A novel method for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making with preference deviation. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 124. 58–64. 84 indexed citations

16.

Qin, Quande, Fuqi Liang, Li Li, Yu‐Wang Chen, & Gao-Feng Yu. (2017). A TODIM-based multi-criteria group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Applied Soft Computing. 55. 93–107. 136 indexed citations

17.

Li, Deng-Feng, et al.. (2014). A Value and Ambiguity-Based Ranking Method of Trapezoidal Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers and Application to Decision Making. The Scientific World JOURNAL. 2014. 1–8. 18 indexed citations

18.

Yu, Gao-Feng, et al.. (2009). Cultural Differences in Compliments. Canadian social science. 1(1). 68–72. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact