Galina Е. Ivanova
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Neurology top 10%
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Roland NigburBirgit StürmerN. А. ShamalovА. А. ШмонинВ. И. СкворцоваB. G. AlekyanВ. В. КрыловYulia Bushkova
- Topics
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (26 papers)Healthcare Systems and Public Health (18 papers)Neurological Disorders and Treatments (17 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSensorsClinical Neurophysiology
In The Last Decade
Galina Е. Ivanova
72 papers receiving 625 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Cognitive Neuroscience 349
- Epidemiology 101
- Neurology 96
- Rehabilitation 94
- Psychiatry and Mental health 70
Countries citing papers authored by Galina Е. Ivanova
This map shows the geographic impact of Galina Е. Ivanova's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Galina Е. Ivanova with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Galina Е. Ivanova more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Galina Е. Ivanova
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Galina Е. Ivanova. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Galina Е. Ivanova. The network helps show where Galina Е. Ivanova may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Galina Е. Ivanova
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Galina Е. Ivanova. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Galina Е. Ivanova based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Galina Е. Ivanova. Galina Е. Ivanova is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | East and West tradition in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: building bridges | 2 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | [Investigation of risk factors of cardiovascular events by the interregional assistance fund of relatives of stroke patients]. | 1 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Galina Е. Ivanova
Galina Е. Ivanova is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Neurology and Anatomy, having authored 95 papers that have together received 644 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (26 papers), Healthcare Systems and Public Health (18 papers) and Neurological Disorders and Treatments (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (349 citations), Rehabilitation (94 citations) and Neurology (96 citations). Galina Е. Ivanova has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, Germany and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Roland Nigbur, Birgit Stürmer, N. А. Shamalov, А. А. Шмонин, В. И. Скворцова, B. G. Alekyan, В. В. Крылов, Yulia Bushkova, А. В. Колсанов and Д. Р. Хасанова. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Sensors and Clinical Neurophysiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.