Gail Hunt

599 total citations
9 papers, 470 citations indexed

About

Gail Hunt is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Gail Hunt has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 470 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Gail Hunt's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Gail Hunt is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Gail Hunt collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. Gail Hunt's co-authors include Joe V. Selby, Rachael Fleurence, Clyde W. Yancy, David Meltzer, Jean R. Slutsky, Noreen Mokuau, Carolyn Gotay, Kathryn L. Braun, Carl C. Bell and Nancy J. Cox and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Internal Medicine and Health Affairs.

In The Last Decade

Gail Hunt

9 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gail Hunt United States 7 199 135 125 60 55 9 470
Christophe Luthy Switzerland 16 168 0.8× 135 1.0× 125 1.0× 79 1.3× 62 1.1× 50 623
Saskia Sivananthan Canada 11 181 0.9× 205 1.5× 85 0.7× 80 1.3× 82 1.5× 30 472
Anne‐Françoise Allaz Switzerland 14 158 0.8× 130 1.0× 66 0.5× 48 0.8× 93 1.7× 58 532
Devi Mohan Malaysia 14 119 0.6× 250 1.9× 142 1.1× 93 1.6× 57 1.0× 56 697
Peter Engeser Germany 13 123 0.6× 54 0.4× 290 2.3× 54 0.9× 24 0.4× 44 551
Lu Hu United States 16 243 1.2× 121 0.9× 195 1.6× 132 2.2× 48 0.9× 56 717
Patrick Chiu Canada 11 126 0.6× 71 0.5× 109 0.9× 48 0.8× 24 0.4× 48 483
Giulia Marton Italy 11 117 0.6× 56 0.4× 53 0.4× 38 0.6× 40 0.7× 20 763
Alejandra Jaramillo Canada 6 103 0.5× 80 0.6× 144 1.2× 40 0.7× 32 0.6× 6 404
Jocelyn Charles Canada 13 210 1.1× 193 1.4× 69 0.6× 35 0.6× 43 0.8× 36 588

Countries citing papers authored by Gail Hunt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gail Hunt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail Hunt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail Hunt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gail Hunt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail Hunt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail Hunt. The network helps show where Gail Hunt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gail Hunt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gail Hunt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gail Hunt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gail Hunt. Gail Hunt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Kent, Erin E., et al.. (2016). Cancer versus non-cancer caregivers: An analysis of communication needs from the 2015 Caregivers in the U.S. study.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 34(26_suppl). 4–4. 6 indexed citations
2.
Witte, Michael M., Norman L. Foster, Adam Fleisher, et al.. (2015). Clinical Use of Amyloid PET Neuroimaging: Practical and Bioethical Considerations. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 23(3). S150–S151. 1 indexed citations
3.
Forsythe, Laura P., Lori Frank, Kara Odom Walker, et al.. (2015). Patient and clinician views on comparative effectiveness research and engagement in research. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. 4(1). 11–25. 31 indexed citations
4.
Witte, Michael M., Norman L. Foster, Adam Fleisher, et al.. (2015). Clinical use of amyloid‐positron emission tomography neuroimaging: Practical and bioethical considerations. Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring. 1(3). 358–367. 35 indexed citations
5.
Fleurence, Rachael, Joe V. Selby, Gail Hunt, et al.. (2013). How The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Is Engaging Patients And Others In Shaping Its Research Agenda. Health Affairs. 32(2). 393–400. 163 indexed citations
6.
Daviglus, Martha L., Carl C. Bell, Wade H. Berrettini, et al.. (2011). Preventing Alzheimer Disease and Cognitive Decline. Annals of Internal Medicine. 154(3). 212–213. 6 indexed citations
7.
Daviglus, Martha L., Carl C. Bell, Wade H. Berrettini, et al.. (2010). NIH state-of-the-science conference statement: Preventing Alzheimer's disease and cognitive decline.. PubMed. 27(4). 1–30. 140 indexed citations
8.
Grossberg, George T., et al.. (2010). The Art of Sharing the Diagnosis and Management of Alzheimer’s Disease With Patients and Caregivers. The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 12(1). PCC.09cs00833–PCC.09cs00833. 25 indexed citations
9.
Braun, Kathryn L., et al.. (2002). Supports and Obstacles to Cancer Survival for Hawaii's Native People. Cancer Practice. 10(4). 192–200. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026