G.A. Osborne

25 total papers · 600 total citations
18 papers, 517 citations indexed

About

G.A. Osborne is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, G.A. Osborne has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 517 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 12 papers in Spectroscopy and 4 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. Recurrent topics in G.A. Osborne's work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (10 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (6 papers) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (6 papers). G.A. Osborne is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (10 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (6 papers) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (6 papers). G.A. Osborne collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. G.A. Osborne's co-authors include A. R. H. Cole, P. J. Stephens, D. A. Ramsay, Jian‐Chun Cheng, Philip J. Stephens, Josef Paldus, John M. Brown, William A. Eaton, F. W. Birss and A Lofthus and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Chemical Physics Letters.

In The Last Decade

G.A. Osborne

17 papers receiving 483 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
G.A. Osborne 316 275 94 68 64 18 517
Enzo Gallinella 311 1.0× 270 1.0× 80 0.9× 56 0.8× 111 1.7× 24 572
Anita Lagutschenkov 240 0.8× 262 1.0× 100 1.1× 36 0.5× 116 1.8× 16 582
J. Morcillo 183 0.6× 228 0.8× 85 0.9× 74 1.1× 95 1.5× 29 499
Doo Wan Boo 233 0.7× 158 0.6× 135 1.4× 91 1.3× 40 0.6× 21 472
C. Huiszoon 270 0.9× 161 0.6× 91 1.0× 73 1.1× 122 1.9× 27 501
Thorsten Metzroth 241 0.8× 209 0.8× 125 1.3× 60 0.9× 65 1.0× 9 534
S. Racine 380 1.2× 265 1.0× 37 0.4× 42 0.6× 94 1.5× 18 521
Ferenc Török 241 0.8× 218 0.8× 43 0.5× 46 0.7× 121 1.9× 12 468
Joanna Kauczor 310 1.0× 157 0.6× 166 1.8× 47 0.7× 115 1.8× 14 528
L. C. Hoskins 170 0.5× 206 0.7× 91 1.0× 30 0.4× 41 0.6× 23 477

Countries citing papers authored by G.A. Osborne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.A. Osborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.A. Osborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.A. Osborne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.A. Osborne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.A. Osborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.A. Osborne. The network helps show where G.A. Osborne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G.A. Osborne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G.A. Osborne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G.A. Osborne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G.A. Osborne. G.A. Osborne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026